Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHPS vs SMH
CHPS vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts CHPS vs SMH
CHPS vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHPS vs. SMH commentary
Jul 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHPS is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 68.8B vs. CHPS (116M). CHPS has a higher annual dividend yield than SMH: CHPS (105.216) vs SMH (69.830). CHPS was incepted earlier than SMH: CHPS (3 years) vs SMH (15 years). CHPS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than SMH (0.35). CHPS has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| CHPS | SMH | CHPS / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 105.216 | 69.830 | 151% |
| Net Assets | 116M | 68.8B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.35 | 43% |
| Turnover | 19.00 | 12.00 | 158% |
| Yield | 0.30 | 0.17 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CHPS | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 89% | 14 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 75% | 12 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ICLO | 25.62 | 0.04 | +0.16% |
| Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF | |||
| PCLO | 24.91 | N/A | N/A |
| Virtus SEIX AAA Private Credit CLO ETF | |||
| GLIN | 46.17 | -0.08 | -0.18% |
| VanEck India Growth Ldrs ETF | |||
| JHMM | 74.39 | -0.23 | -0.31% |
| JHancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | |||
| PONX | 3.07 | -0.46 | -13.03% |
| Tradr 2X Long PONY Daily ETF | |||
CHPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHPS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHPS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHPS | 100% | N/A | ||
| LRCX - CHPS | 77% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| AMAT - CHPS | 73% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| KLAC - CHPS | 73% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| MPWR - CHPS | 72% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| MU - CHPS | 71% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | N/A | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 84% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| ASML - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| MPWR - SMH | 79% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||