CHPS
Price
$82.39
Change
-$0.20 (-0.24%)
Updated
Aug 20, 04:45 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
105.82M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMH
Price
$562.65
Change
+$1.73 (+0.31%)
Updated
Aug 20, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
68.69B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHPS vs SMH

CHPS vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 16, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) vs. VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH)

Key Takeaways

  • CHPS tracks the Solactive Semiconductor Focus Index with approximately 50-60 holdings and a 0.15% expense ratio, offering broader diversification within the global semiconductor sector compared to SMH.
  • SMH tracks the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index with about 26 holdings and a 0.35% expense ratio, resulting in higher concentration, particularly in leading names such as NVDA.
  • Both ETFs provide passive exposure to semiconductor companies but differ in geographic reach, with CHPS emphasizing a more global selection and SMH focusing on U.S.-listed securities.
  • CHPS features more even weighting across top holdings (typically under 6% each), while SMH exhibits greater concentration risk due to heavier allocations to the largest constituents.
  • Expense ratio differences make CHPS more cost-efficient for long-term investors, potentially enhancing net returns over market cycles.
  • Both ETFs target similar thematic goals in the semiconductor industry but position investors differently regarding diversification and cost structures.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to the semiconductor sector often compare specialized exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that track industry benchmarks. Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) both deliver passive strategies focused on semiconductor companies, yet they employ distinct index methodologies and portfolio constructions. These ETFs serve as alternatives rather than direct competitors, allowing investors to select based on preferences for diversification, cost, and geographic emphasis within the same thematic space. The comparison highlights structural differences relevant to portfolio allocation decisions in the current market environment.

Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) Overview

CHPS is a passive ETF that seeks to replicate the performance of the Solactive Semiconductor Focus Index before fees and expenses. The index selects approximately 50 to 60 global companies involved in the semiconductor industry, with a market-capitalization weighting approach. As of recent data, the fund holds around 53 to 61 securities, with top holdings including Broadcom Inc. (AVGO), NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA), ASML Holding NV (ASML), Lam Research Corp. (LRCX), and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (TSM), each typically representing 4% to 5% of the portfolio. Sector allocation is overwhelmingly concentrated in information technology (over 98%), with minimal exposure elsewhere. The expense ratio stands at 0.15%, and the fund employs a standard passive rebalancing methodology aligned with index changes. This structure provides diversified access to semiconductor leaders across multiple regions.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Overview

SMH is a passive ETF designed to replicate the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index before fees and expenses. The index focuses on 25 U.S.-listed companies engaged in semiconductor production and equipment. The fund maintains approximately 26 holdings, with significant concentration in leading names such as NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA) at around 20% to 22%, followed by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd. (TSM), Broadcom Inc. (AVGO), and others in the 4% to 9% range. Sector allocation centers almost entirely on information technology. The expense ratio is 0.35%, reflecting the costs associated with its concentrated strategy. SMH uses passive rebalancing to match index constituents and weights, resulting in a more focused exposure profile compared to broader semiconductor benchmarks.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The semiconductor industry operates within a dynamic environment shaped by technological advancements in artificial intelligence, data centers, and consumer electronics. Capital flows into the sector have remained robust amid ongoing innovation cycles and supply chain adjustments. Macroeconomic factors, including interest rate expectations and global trade policies, influence capital expenditures by chip manufacturers. Regulatory developments around export controls and technology standards add complexity, while geopolitical tensions can affect supply chains involving key players in Taiwan and other regions. Both ETFs benefit from sector momentum driven by demand for advanced chips but face risks from cyclical downturns in end markets and potential disruptions in international trade.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, CHPS and SMH have exhibited correlated movements tied to semiconductor earnings and broader technology trends, though their structural differences influence relative behavior. SMH's concentration in top holdings can lead to amplified responses during periods of strength in leading companies, while CHPS's broader diversification may moderate volatility across rotations in sub-sectors. Both have participated in sector advances linked to artificial intelligence adoption and capital spending by major technology firms. CHPS's lower expense ratio supports more efficient compounding over extended periods, whereas SMH's focus aligns closely with U.S.-listed leaders during earnings-driven rallies. Relative positioning favors CHPS for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and reduced single-stock risk, and SMH for those seeking concentrated exposure to market leaders.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. AI Screener

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently favor Xtrackers Semiconductor Select Equity ETF (CHPS) due to its lower expense ratio, greater number of holdings for improved diversification, and more balanced exposure across the semiconductor value chain. These characteristics support stronger risk-adjusted positioning and cost efficiency over market cycles, while maintaining comparable thematic alignment with sector momentum.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CHPS vs. SMH commentary
Aug 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHPS is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 68.7B vs. CHPS (106M). CHPS has a higher annual dividend yield than SMH: CHPS (75.175) vs SMH (55.755). CHPS was incepted earlier than SMH: CHPS (3 years) vs SMH (15 years). CHPS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than SMH (0.35). CHPS has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
CHPSSMHCHPS / SMH
Gain YTD75.17555.755135%
Net Assets106M68.7B0%
Total Expense Ratio0.150.3543%
Turnover19.0012.00158%
Yield0.390.20190%
Fund Existence3 years15 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHPSSMH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHPS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NVAX8.790.86
+10.84%
Novavax
QMMM119.40N/A
N/A
QMMM Holdings Ltd
MDBH2.87-0.04
-1.37%
MDB Capital Holdings LLC
BPRN42.08-1.08
-2.50%
Princeton Bancorp
CRWD201.63-11.29
-5.30%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

CHPS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHPS has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CHPS jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHPS
1D Price
Change %
CHPS100%
-1.51%
LRCX - CHPS
86%
Closely correlated
-6.33%
AMAT - CHPS
81%
Closely correlated
-3.53%
KLAC - CHPS
80%
Closely correlated
-3.86%
MU - CHPS
80%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
ASX - CHPS
80%
Closely correlated
-2.06%
More

SMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMH
1D Price
Change %
SMH100%
-1.55%
LRCX - SMH
88%
Closely correlated
-6.33%
KLAC - SMH
85%
Closely correlated
-3.86%
AMAT - SMH
85%
Closely correlated
-3.53%
ASML - SMH
84%
Closely correlated
-2.84%
TSM - SMH
83%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
More