CHPY
Price
$67.15
Change
+$1.96 (+3.01%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
1.17B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QYLD
Price
$18.36
Change
+$0.03 (+0.16%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Net Assets
8.35B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHPY vs QYLD

CHPY vs QYLD Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) vs. Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD)

Key Takeaways

  • CHPY is an actively managed ETF targeting a concentrated portfolio of 15-30 semiconductor companies with options strategies to generate high weekly income, while QYLD is a passive ETF tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index with covered call writing for monthly distributions.
  • CHPY carries a higher expense ratio of 1.03% and elevated risk due to its thematic focus and options approach that caps upside participation, compared to QYLD’s lower 0.60% expense ratio and broader large-cap technology exposure.
  • Both ETFs employ options-based income generation, yet CHPY’s strategy emphasizes single-stock call spreads on semiconductors, whereas QYLD sells index-level calls on the Nasdaq-100, resulting in different volatility and yield profiles.
  • CHPY offers significantly higher indicated distribution rates but with greater potential for capital erosion in declining markets, positioning it as a higher-risk income vehicle versus QYLD’s more balanced risk-return profile.
  • Sector exposure differs markedly: CHPY provides pure-play semiconductor allocation, while QYLD delivers diversified technology and growth equity exposure across approximately 100 holdings.
  • Structural differences in management style, rebalancing frequency, and liquidity characteristics make the two ETFs suitable for distinct investor objectives within income-oriented strategies.

Introduction

Investors seeking income through options-enhanced equity strategies often compare specialized covered-call ETFs. The YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) and the Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) both pursue current income via options premiums while maintaining equity exposure. They do not compete directly; instead, they represent alternative approaches within the derivative-income category. CHPY delivers concentrated thematic exposure to semiconductors, whereas QYLD provides broad Nasdaq-100 participation. This comparison highlights their structural distinctions, risk characteristics, and relevance amid ongoing technology sector momentum and interest-rate sensitivity in the current market environment.

YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) Overview

CHPY is an actively managed ETF that seeks current income as its primary objective and capital appreciation as a secondary goal through direct investments in a select portfolio of 15-30 U.S.-listed semiconductor companies. The fund employs options strategies, including the sale of call spreads on portfolio holdings, to generate premiums distributed weekly. It maintains synthetic replication and features an expense ratio of 1.03%. Top holdings typically include major semiconductor names such as NVIDIA Corp (NVDA), Broadcom Inc (AVGO), and Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD). Sector allocation is heavily concentrated in electronic technology. Launched in April 2025, CHPY distinguishes itself through its thematic focus and weekly distribution cadence, though the options overlay limits full participation in upward price movements of underlying holdings.

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) Overview

QYLD is a passively managed ETF designed to track the Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index. It holds the components of the Nasdaq-100 Index and systematically writes at-the-money index call options to generate income distributed monthly. The fund contains approximately 100 holdings with significant representation from leading technology companies. Its expense ratio stands at 0.60%. Key holdings commonly include NVIDIA Corp (NVDA), Apple Inc (AAPL), and Microsoft Corp (MSFT). QYLD follows a rules-based rebalancing methodology tied to the underlying index and options expiration cycle. Established in 2013, it offers broad large-cap growth equity exposure combined with covered-call income generation in a liquid, established structure.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The semiconductor and broader technology sectors continue to experience structural tailwinds from artificial intelligence adoption, data-center expansion, and semiconductor innovation cycles. Capital flows into technology equities have remained resilient amid evolving interest-rate expectations and global supply-chain adjustments. Regulatory developments around export controls and antitrust scrutiny introduce ongoing risks for semiconductor firms. Macroeconomic drivers, including corporate capital expenditure trends and geopolitical tensions affecting chip supply, influence both ETFs. QYLD benefits from diversified exposure across the Nasdaq-100, while CHPY’s concentrated semiconductor positioning amplifies sensitivity to sector-specific earnings cycles and volatility. These dynamics shape relative positioning for income-focused investors navigating growth-oriented markets.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, CHPY’s concentrated semiconductor focus and options overlay have produced elevated distribution rates alongside notable volatility tied to individual stock movements and implied-volatility changes. QYLD has demonstrated more stable income generation and lower drawdown potential during technology rotations due to its index-level covered-call approach and broader holdings. Performance differentials arise from sector rotation favoring or disfavoring semiconductors versus the wider Nasdaq-100, as well as differences in how each fund captures or caps upside during earnings-driven rallies. CHPY’s strategy suits investors tolerant of thematic concentration, while QYLD appeals to those seeking diversified large-cap technology exposure with consistent monthly income. Relative positioning reflects trade-offs between yield magnitude and diversification benefits across recent weeks and months.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking to explore additional opportunities aligned with semiconductor or Nasdaq-100 themes may find the tool particularly useful for refining their research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favor to QYLD. The ETF’s lower expense ratio, established passive structure, broader diversification across approximately 100 holdings, and consistent monthly distribution profile provide structural advantages in cost efficiency and risk management. While CHPY offers compelling thematic semiconductor exposure and higher indicated yields, its elevated expense ratio, concentrated active strategy, and capped upside potential introduce greater variability. Observable factors such as diversification profile, cost structure, and trend consistency across market cycles support QYLD’s relative positioning for income-oriented strategies at this time.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CHPY vs. QYLD commentary
Sep 08, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHPY is a Hold and QYLD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QYLD has more net assets: 8.35B vs. CHPY (1.17B). CHPY has a higher annual dividend yield than QYLD: CHPY (60.917) vs QYLD (11.478). CHPY was incepted earlier than QYLD: CHPY (1 year) vs QYLD (13 years). QYLD (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than CHPY (1.03). QYLD has a higher turnover CHPY (16.00) vs CHPY (16.00).
CHPYQYLDCHPY / QYLD
Gain YTD60.91711.478531%
Net Assets1.17B8.35B14%
Total Expense Ratio1.030.60172%
Turnover16.0024.4665%
Yield25.159.67260%
Fund Existence1 year13 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CHPYQYLD
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
76%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CHPY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QYLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EUO29.920.11
+0.38%
ProShares UltraShort Euro
FEUZ68.630.19
+0.28%
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® ETF
MCOW21.45N/A
N/A
Pacer S&P MidCp 400 Qul FCF Arstcrts ETF
LRND46.63-0.13
-0.28%
NYLIM U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF
PABU78.69-0.52
-0.66%
iShares Paris-Algnd Clmt Optd MSCIUSAETF

CHPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHPY has been loosely correlated with UMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHPY jumps, then UMC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHPY
1D Price
Change %
CHPY100%
+3.01%
UMC - CHPY
56%
Loosely correlated
+4.58%
NVDA - CHPY
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
AMD - CHPY
-4%
Poorly correlated
+4.69%
AVGO - CHPY
-7%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
INTC - CHPY
-8%
Poorly correlated
+4.51%
More

QYLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QYLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QYLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QYLD
1D Price
Change %
QYLD100%
+0.16%
LRCX - QYLD
66%
Closely correlated
+5.12%
AMAT - QYLD
63%
Loosely correlated
+4.31%
KLAC - QYLD
63%
Loosely correlated
+7.32%
ASML - QYLD
61%
Loosely correlated
+4.17%
MU - QYLD
57%
Loosely correlated
+6.10%
More