| CHPY | QYLD | CHPY / QYLD | |
| Gain YTD | 67.442 | 9.463 | 713% |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 8.31B | 14% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.60 | 172% |
| Turnover | 16.00 | 24.46 | 65% |
| Yield | 23.35 | 9.88 | 236% |
| Fund Existence | 1 year | 13 years | - |
| CHPY | QYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 27 days ago 44% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 74% | 18 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 86% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PRN | 227.25 | 4.13 | +1.85% |
| Invesco Dorsey Wright IndustrialsMomtETF | |||
| CPST | 28.02 | N/A | N/A |
| Calamos S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF-Sep | |||
| GTO | 46.29 | -0.11 | -0.25% |
| Invesco Total Return Bond ETF | |||
| PBRG | 33.04 | -0.12 | -0.36% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long PBR Daily ETF | |||
| DWUS | 60.66 | -0.25 | -0.41% |
| AdvisorShares DW FSM US Core ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHPY has been loosely correlated with UMC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHPY jumps, then UMC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHPY | 100% | -0.20% | ||
| UMC - CHPY | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| NVDA - CHPY | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.06% | ||
| AMD - CHPY | -4% Poorly correlated | +6.50% | ||
| INTC - CHPY | -7% Poorly correlated | -1.97% | ||
| AVGO - CHPY | -8% Poorly correlated | -5.94% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QYLD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QYLD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QYLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QYLD | 100% | +0.11% | ||
| LRCX - QYLD | 67% Closely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| KLAC - QYLD | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| AMAT - QYLD | 64% Loosely correlated | -5.12% | ||
| ASML - QYLD | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| NVDA - QYLD | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
More | ||||