Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHRSX vs FWWMX
CHRSX vs FWWMX Comparison
Open Charts CHRSX vs FWWMX
CHRSX vs FWWMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. CHRSX (3.71B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than CHRSX: FWWMX (1.40) vs CHRSX (0.30). CHRSX was incepted earlier than FWWMX: CHRSX (17 years) vs FWWMX (6 years). CHRSX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). CHRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). CHRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: CHRSX (0) vs FWWMX (250). CHRSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.34 vs. FWWMX (8.15). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.36 vs. CHRSX (14.83).
| CHRSX | FWWMX | CHRSX / FWWMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.31 | 294% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.31 | 294% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.995 | 1.616 | 371% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.71B | 218B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 1.40 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.34 | 8.15 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.85 | 30.60 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.83 | 30.36 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.92 | N/A | - |