Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHRSX vs FWWMX
CHRSX vs FWWMX Comparison
Open Charts CHRSX vs FWWMX
CHRSX vs FWWMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. CHRSX (3.75B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than CHRSX: FWWMX (1.44) vs CHRSX (0.30). CHRSX was incepted earlier than FWWMX: CHRSX (17 years) vs FWWMX (6 years). CHRSX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). CHRSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). CHRSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FWWMX: CHRSX (0) vs FWWMX (250). CHRSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.43 vs. FWWMX (5.76). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.81 vs. CHRSX (12.78).
| CHRSX | FWWMX | CHRSX / FWWMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.31 | 294% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.31 | 294% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.885 | 3.857 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.75B | 219B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 1.44 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.43 | 5.76 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.85 | 29.16 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.78 | 30.81 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.81 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement