Advertisement
CHT vs LBTYB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHT is a Hold and LBTYB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLBTYB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CHT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LBTYB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LBTYB’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CHT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- LBTYB’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
CHT (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а -0.16% price change this week, while LBTYB (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was -0.11% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +2.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.89%.
Reported Earning Dates
CHT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
LBTYB is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Wireless Telecommunications (+2.05% weekly)Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.
| CHT | LBTYB | CHT / LBTYB | |
| Capitalization | 30.6B | 6.41B | 478% |
| EBITDA | 87.3B | -501.1M | -17,422% |
| Gain YTD | 20.376 | -23.251 | -88% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.49 | 16.18 | 164% |
| Revenue | 219B | 7.49B | 2,924% |
| Total Cash | 43.3B | 3.41B | 1,271% |
| Total Debt | 43.8B | 17.4B | 252% |
CHT | LBTYB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 75 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 47 Fair valued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 70 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 70 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CHT's Valuation (47) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as LBTYB (66) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that CHT’s stock grew similarly to LBTYB’s over the last 12 months.
CHT's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Major Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LBTYB (100) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that CHT’s stock grew somewhat faster than LBTYB’s over the last 12 months.
CHT's SMR Rating (70) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as LBTYB (90) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that CHT’s stock grew similarly to LBTYB’s over the last 12 months.
CHT's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as LBTYB (61) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that CHT’s stock grew similarly to LBTYB’s over the last 12 months.
CHT's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as LBTYB (70) in the Cable Or Satellite TV industry. This means that CHT’s stock grew similarly to LBTYB’s over the last 12 months.
| CHT | LBTYB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 13% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 36% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 18% | 2 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 18% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 18% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 16% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 28% | 12 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 26% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 63% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 61% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AVSU | 70.57 | 0.36 | +0.52% |
| Avantis Responsible US Equity ETF | |||
| SEPT | 32.97 | 0.09 | +0.29% |
| AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer10 Sep ETF | |||
| CVY | 26.46 | 0.05 | +0.20% |
| Invesco Zacks Multi-Asset Income ETF | |||
| FLTR | 25.55 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF | |||
| LFAV | 95.54 | N/A | N/A |
| LifeX 2059 Longevity Income ETF | |||
CHT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHT has been loosely correlated with TLK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHT jumps, then TLK could also see price increases.
LBTYB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LBTYB has been loosely correlated with LBTYA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LBTYB jumps, then LBTYA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LBTYB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LBTYB | 100% | N/A | ||
| LBTYA - LBTYB | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| LBTYK - LBTYB | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| CHT - LBTYB | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.02% | ||
| CABO - LBTYB | 22% Poorly correlated | -5.52% | ||
| LUMN - LBTYB | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.81% | ||
More | ||||