Advertisement
CHT vs SGAPY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHT is a Hold and SGAPY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSGAPY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CHT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SGAPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHT’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGAPY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CHT’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SGAPY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CHT (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а +0.64% price change this week, while SGAPY (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was +1.74% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.97%.
Reported Earning Dates
CHT is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
SGAPY is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Wireless Telecommunications (+0.53% weekly)Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.
| CHT | SGAPY | CHT / SGAPY | |
| Capitalization | 30.6B | 32.8B | 93% |
| EBITDA | 87.3B | 5.57B | 1,567% |
| Gain YTD | 16.228 | 34.077 | 48% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.49 | 19.88 | 133% |
| Revenue | 219B | 14.6B | 1,500% |
| Total Cash | 43.3B | 1.67B | 2,596% |
| Total Debt | 43.8B | 10.9B | 402% |
CHT | SGAPY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | 44 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 69 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SGAPY's Valuation (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CHT (53) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that SGAPY’s stock grew similarly to CHT’s over the last 12 months.
SGAPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHT (37) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that SGAPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHT’s over the last 12 months.
CHT's SMR Rating (69) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as SGAPY (98) in the null industry. This means that CHT’s stock grew similarly to SGAPY’s over the last 12 months.
SGAPY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as CHT (47) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that SGAPY’s stock grew similarly to CHT’s over the last 12 months.
CHT's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Major Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGAPY (98) in the null industry. This means that CHT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGAPY’s over the last 12 months.
| CHT | SGAPY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 6% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 29% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 18% | 3 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 24% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 28% | 3 days ago 61% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 16% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 27% | 5 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 26% | 10 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 12% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 23% | 3 days ago 62% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KNPYX | 140.85 | 2.26 | +1.63% |
| Kinetics Paradigm Instl | |||
| FDTZX | 23.32 | 0.24 | +1.04% |
| Fidelity Advisor Capital Development M | |||
| MNNYX | 65.29 | 0.61 | +0.94% |
| Victory Munder Multi-Cap Y | |||
| NSFOX | 11.28 | 0.09 | +0.80% |
| Natixis Target Retirement 2065 N | |||
| GIDUX | 8.02 | 0.02 | +0.25% |
| Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Div & Prem R6 | |||
CHT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHT has been loosely correlated with VOD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHT jumps, then VOD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHT | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| VOD - CHT | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| DTEGY - CHT | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| TIGO - CHT | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| RCI - CHT | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
| IQST - CHT | 29% Poorly correlated | +0.80% | ||
More | ||||
SGAPY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGAPY has been loosely correlated with SKM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGAPY jumps, then SKM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGAPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGAPY | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| SKM - SGAPY | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| RCI - SGAPY | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
| TLGPY - SGAPY | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CHT - SGAPY | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.14% | ||
| ATEX - SGAPY | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.77% | ||
More | ||||