Advertisement
CHT vs SGAPY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHT is a Hold and SGAPY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSGAPY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CHT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SGAPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SGAPY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CHT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SGAPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CHT (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +1.49% price change this week, while SGAPY (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -0.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.34%.
Reported Earning Dates
CHT is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.
SGAPY is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (+1.34% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| CHT | SGAPY | CHT / SGAPY | |
| Capitalization | 33.7B | 53.7B | 63% |
| EBITDA | 89.6B | 7.45B | 1,202% |
| Gain YTD | 19.990 | 51.701 | 39% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.36 | 17.57 | 156% |
| Revenue | 232B | 14.1B | 1,645% |
| Total Cash | 73.9B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 43.6B | N/A | - |
CHT | SGAPY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 66 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 51 Fair valued | 55 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 69 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 40 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CHT's Valuation (51) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as SGAPY (55) in the null industry. This means that CHT’s stock grew similarly to SGAPY’s over the last 12 months.
SGAPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHT (41) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that SGAPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHT’s over the last 12 months.
CHT's SMR Rating (69) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as SGAPY (96) in the null industry. This means that CHT’s stock grew similarly to SGAPY’s over the last 12 months.
SGAPY's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as CHT (53) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that SGAPY’s stock grew similarly to CHT’s over the last 12 months.
CHT's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Major Telecommunications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SGAPY (100) in the null industry. This means that CHT’s stock grew somewhat faster than SGAPY’s over the last 12 months.
| CHT | SGAPY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 14% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 47% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 28% | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 17% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 27% | 16 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 26% | 2 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 23% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 26% | 2 days ago 66% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EMPB | 28.72 | 0.26 | +0.91% |
| Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF | |||
| EIS | 98.27 | 0.39 | +0.40% |
| iShares MSCI Israel ETF | |||
| BITC | 42.08 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| Bitwise Trendwise Bitcoin&TreasRotaStrat | |||
| CGBL | 34.75 | -0.01 | -0.03% |
| Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | |||
| STXT | 20.41 | -0.04 | -0.17% |
| Strive Total Return Bond ETF | |||
CHT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHT has been loosely correlated with DTEGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHT jumps, then DTEGY could also see price increases.
SGAPY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGAPY has been loosely correlated with SKM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SGAPY jumps, then SKM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGAPY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGAPY | 100% | -0.12% | ||
| SKM - SGAPY | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| RCI - SGAPY | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
| KT - SGAPY | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
| TLGPY - SGAPY | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
| CHT - SGAPY | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.37% | ||
More | ||||