CHTH
Price
$2.96
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 29 closing price
Capitalization
613.11M
LNSPF
Price
$2.70
Change
+$0.10 (+3.85%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
2.34B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CHTH vs LNSPF

Header iconCHTH vs LNSPF Comparison
Open Charts CHTH vs LNSPFBanner chart's image
CNL Healthcare Pptys
Price$2.96
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.25K
Capitalization613.11M
London & Stamford Property
Price$2.70
Change+$0.10 (+3.85%)
Volume$1.36K
Capitalization2.34B
CHTH vs LNSPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CHTH vs. LNSPF commentary
Jun 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHTH is a Hold and LNSPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2025
Stock price -- (CHTH: $2.96 vs. LNSPF: $2.70)
Brand notoriety: CHTH and LNSPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CHTH: 81% vs. LNSPF: 43%
Market capitalization -- CHTH: $613.11M vs. LNSPF: $2.34B
CHTH [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $613.11M. LNSPF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $2.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CHTH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLNSPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CHTH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LNSPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CHTH is a better buy in the long-term than LNSPF.

Price Growth

CHTH (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -0.04% price change this week, while LNSPF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was +4.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.75%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+0.47% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LNSPF($2.34B) has a higher market cap than CHTH($613M). LNSPF YTD gains are higher at: 19.734 vs. CHTH (5.679). CHTH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 68M vs. LNSPF (-477.5M). CHTH has more cash in the bank: 54.1M vs. LNSPF (23.9M). CHTH has less debt than LNSPF: CHTH (578M) vs LNSPF (1.02B). CHTH has higher revenues than LNSPF: CHTH (341M) vs LNSPF (147M).
CHTHLNSPFCHTH / LNSPF
Capitalization613M2.34B26%
EBITDA68M-477.5M-14%
Gain YTD5.67919.73429%
P/E RatioN/A7.23-
Revenue341M147M232%
Total Cash54.1M23.9M226%
Total Debt578M1.02B57%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LNSPF: Fundamental Ratings
LNSPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
34
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
87
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ESMYX16.89N/A
N/A
Invesco EQV Euro Small Company Y
GMLPX38.83N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs MLP Energy Infras Instl
JFARX36.09N/A
N/A
JHancock Fundamental All Cap Core R4
BPTUX207.34N/A
N/A
Baron Partners R6
CLTAX15.52N/A
N/A
Catalyst/Lyons Tactical Allocation A

CHTH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CHTH and LNSPF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHTH and LNSPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CHTH
1D Price
Change %
CHTH100%
N/A
LNSPF - CHTH
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAPIF - CHTH
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MEIYF - CHTH
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LADR - CHTH
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.67%
DWVYF - CHTH
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LNSPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNSPF has been loosely correlated with MEIYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LNSPF jumps, then MEIYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNSPF
1D Price
Change %
LNSPF100%
N/A
MEIYF - LNSPF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DWVYF - LNSPF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FESNF - LNSPF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CHTH - LNSPF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAPIF - LNSPF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More