Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHTRX vs FWWMX
CHTRX vs FWWMX Comparison
Open Charts CHTRX vs FWWMX
CHTRX vs FWWMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. CHTRX (3.71B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than CHTRX: FWWMX (1.40) vs CHTRX (0.21). CHTRX was incepted earlier than FWWMX: CHTRX (58 years) vs FWWMX (6 years). CHTRX (1.01) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). CHTRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). FWWMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CHTRX: FWWMX (250) vs CHTRX (1000). CHTRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.23 vs. FWWMX (8.15). FWWMX return over 5 years is better than : 30.36 vs. CHTRX (14.32).
| CHTRX | FWWMX | CHTRX / FWWMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.31 | 326% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.31 | 326% |
| Fund Existence | 58 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.995 | 1.616 | 371% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.71B | 218B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 1.40 | 15% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.23 | 8.15 | 150% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.47 | 30.60 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.32 | 30.36 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement