Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHUSX vs RNPAX
CHUSX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CHUSX vs RNPAX
CHUSX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHUSX vs. RNPAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHUSX is a Buy and RNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. CHUSX (19.8M). RNPAX pays higher dividends than CHUSX: RNPAX (0.37) vs CHUSX (0.00). CHUSX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: CHUSX (23 years) vs RNPAX (24 years). CHUSX (2.19) is less costly to investors than RNPAX (1.49). CHUSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.92 vs. RNPAX (23.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CHUSX: RNPAX (250) vs CHUSX (1000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.41 vs. CHUSX (-4.29). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 7.09 vs. CHUSX (-16.50).
| CHUSX | RNPAX | CHUSX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.49 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 1.49 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.265 | 4.455 | 118% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.8M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.37 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.29 | 5.41 | -79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.73 | 29.24 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.50 | 7.09 | -233% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.44 | 92.75 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers