Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHUSX vs RNPAX
CHUSX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CHUSX vs RNPAX
CHUSX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHUSX vs. RNPAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHUSX is a Buy and RNPAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 169B vs. CHUSX (19.2M). RNPAX pays higher dividends than CHUSX: RNPAX (0.36) vs CHUSX (0.00). CHUSX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: CHUSX (23 years) vs RNPAX (24 years). CHUSX (2.19) is less costly to investors than RNPAX (1.49). CHUSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 86.92 vs. RNPAX (23.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CHUSX: RNPAX (250) vs CHUSX (1000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.70 vs. CHUSX (-9.50). RNPAX return over 5 years is better than : 5.55 vs. CHUSX (-21.78).
| CHUSX | RNPAX | CHUSX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 1.49 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 1.49 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.123 | 6.007 | 52% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.2M | 169B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.36 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.50 | 2.70 | -352% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.87 | 35.23 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.78 | 5.55 | -393% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.28 | 97.01 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement