Ad is loading...
CHUSX vs RNPEX
CHUSX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts CHUSX vs RNPEX
Alger Global Equity A
Price$25.43
Change+$0.43 (+1.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.72M
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$58.78
Change+$0.91 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets132.87B
CHUSX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHUSX vs. RNPEX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHUSX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. CHUSX (18.7M). RNPEX pays higher dividends than CHUSX: RNPEX (0.56) vs CHUSX (0.00). CHUSX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: CHUSX (21 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). CHUSX (2.30) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). CHUSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.65 vs. RNPEX (24.00). RNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CHUSX: RNPEX (250) vs CHUSX (1000). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.61 vs. CHUSX (-13.31). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 42.15 vs. CHUSX (22.55).
| CHUSX | RNPEX | CHUSX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.76 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 0.76 | 303% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.362 | -4.991 | 208% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.7M | 133B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.56 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.31 | 0.61 | -2,178% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.92 | 7.60 | -52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.55 | 42.15 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.02 | 50.66 | 43% |