Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CHUSX vs RNPEX
CHUSX vs RNPEX Comparison
Open Charts CHUSX vs RNPEX
Alger Global Equity A
Price$30.50
Change+$0.08 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.82M
American Funds New Perspective R4
Price$70.50
Change+$0.34 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets159.21B
CHUSX vs RNPEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CHUSX vs. RNPEX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHUSX is a Buy and RNPEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPEX has more cash in the bank: 159B vs. CHUSX (21.8M). RNPEX pays higher dividends than CHUSX: RNPEX (0.48) vs CHUSX (0.00). CHUSX was incepted earlier than RNPEX: CHUSX (22 years) vs RNPEX (23 years). CHUSX (2.54) is less costly to investors than RNPEX (0.76). CHUSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.65 vs. RNPEX (24.00). RNPEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CHUSX: RNPEX (250) vs CHUSX (1000). RNPEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.07 vs. CHUSX (-0.62). RNPEX return over 5 years is better than : 34.86 vs. CHUSX (15.84).
| CHUSX | RNPEX | CHUSX / RNPEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.76 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.54 | 0.76 | 334% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.358 | 15.745 | 59% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.8M | 159B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.62 | 15.07 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.19 | 48.49 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.84 | 34.86 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.33 | 97.33 | 68% |