CIBCX
Price
$84.58
Change
-$0.10 (-0.12%)
Updated
Sep 1 closing price
Net Assets
130.39B
FFAAX
Price
$18.73
Change
-$0.05 (-0.27%)
Updated
Aug 31 closing price
Net Assets
2.96B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIBCX vs FFAAX

CIBCX vs FFAAX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
published Highlights

Market Cap

The average market capitalization across the group is 66.68B. The market cap for tickers in the group ranges from 2.96B to 130.39B. CIBCX holds the highest valuation in this group at 130.39B. The lowest valued company is FFAAX at 2.96B.

High and low price notable news

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the group was -0%. For the same group, the average monthly price growth was 1%, and the average quarterly price growth was 7%. FFAAX experienced the highest price growth at 0%, while CIBCX experienced the biggest fall at -0%.

Volume

The average weekly volume growth across all stocks in the group was 0%. For the same stocks of the group, the average monthly volume growth was 0% and the average quarterly volume growth was 0%

Fundamental Analysis Ratings

The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows

Valuation Rating:
P/E Growth Rating:
Price Growth Rating:
SMR Rating:
Profit Risk Rating:
Seasonality Score: (-100 ... +100)
VS
CIBCX vs. FFAAX commentary
Sep 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a Hold and FFAAX is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 130B vs. FFAAX (2.96B). CIBCX pays higher dividends than FFAAX: CIBCX (1.96) vs FFAAX (1.79). CIBCX was incepted earlier than FFAAX: CIBCX (25 years) vs FFAAX (23 years). CIBCX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FFAAX (0.77). CIBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFAAX (33.16). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAAX: CIBCX (250) vs FFAAX (100000). FFAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.15 vs. CIBCX (10.04). FFAAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.83 vs. CIBCX (34.50).
CIBCXFFAAXCIBCX / FFAAX
Total Expense Ratio1.330.75177%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio1.330.77173%
Fund Existence25 years23 years-
Gain YTD10.3899.204113%
Front LoadN/AN/A-
Min. Initial Investment2501000000%
Min. Initial Investment IRAN/AN/A-
Net Assets130B2.96B4,387%
Annual Yield % from dividends1.961.79109%
Returns for 1 year10.0412.1583%
Returns for 3 years42.0545.3793%
Returns for 5 years34.5038.8389%
Returns for 10 years61.9969.0490%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NOWL8.910.39
+4.58%
GraniteShares 2x Long NOW Daily ETF
EMTL42.56N/A
N/A
SPDR DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF
OXLC9.71N/A
N/A
Oxford Lane Capital Corp.
VWO60.52-0.27
-0.44%
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
AGMI77.61-0.85
-1.08%
Themes Silver Miners ETF