Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBCX vs FFAAX
CIBCX vs FFAAX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs FFAAX
CIBCX vs FFAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. FFAAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a Hold and FFAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 127B vs. FFAAX (2.97B). CIBCX pays higher dividends than FFAAX: CIBCX (2.02) vs FFAAX (0.96). CIBCX was incepted earlier than FFAAX: CIBCX (25 years) vs FFAAX (23 years). CIBCX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FFAAX (0.77). CIBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFAAX (33.16). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAAX: CIBCX (250) vs FFAAX (100000). FFAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.06 vs. CIBCX (11.78). FFAAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.34 vs. CIBCX (31.79).
| CIBCX | FFAAX | CIBCX / FFAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.75 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 0.77 | 173% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.828 | 8.276 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 127B | 2.97B | 4,272% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 0.96 | 212% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.78 | 15.06 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.53 | 46.61 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.79 | 41.34 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.10 | 74.35 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement