Ad is loading...
CIBCX vs FFACX
CIBCX vs FFACX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs FFACX
American Funds Capital Income Bldr C
Price$73.14
Change+$0.78 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.11B
Franklin Global Allocation C
Price$15.74
Change+$0.12 (+0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.64B
CIBCX vs FFACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. FFACX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a Buy and FFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FFACX (2.64B). CIBCX pays higher dividends than FFACX: CIBCX (2.40) vs FFACX (0.39). CIBCX was incepted earlier than FFACX: CIBCX (24 years) vs FFACX (22 years). FFACX (1.75) is less costly to investors than CIBCX (1.34). FFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.82 vs. CIBCX (56.00). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFACX: CIBCX (250) vs FFACX (1000). CIBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.21 vs. FFACX (9.06). CIBCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.89 vs. FFACX (42.32).
| CIBCX | FFACX | CIBCX / FFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.72 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.75 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.127 | 0.904 | 677% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 109B | 2.64B | 4,126% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.40 | 0.39 | 615% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.21 | 9.06 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.68 | 17.89 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.89 | 42.32 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.02 | 26.38 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...