Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBCX vs FFACX
CIBCX vs FFACX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs FFACX
CIBCX vs FFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. FFACX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a Hold and FFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. FFACX (2.92B). CIBCX pays higher dividends than FFACX: CIBCX (1.96) vs FFACX (1.16). CIBCX was incepted earlier than FFACX: CIBCX (26 years) vs FFACX (23 years). FFACX (1.77) is less costly to investors than CIBCX (1.33). CIBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFACX (33.16). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFACX: CIBCX (250) vs FFACX (1000). FFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. CIBCX (6.85). CIBCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.82 vs. FFACX (31.63).
| CIBCX | FFACX | CIBCX / FFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.75 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.77 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.084 | 7.044 | 129% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131B | 2.92B | 4,494% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.96 | 1.16 | 169% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.85 | 7.68 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.27 | 40.46 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.82 | 31.63 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.63 | 58.46 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement