Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBCX vs FFACX
CIBCX vs FFACX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs FFACX
CIBCX vs FFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. FFACX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a Buy and FFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. FFACX (2.96B). CIBCX pays higher dividends than FFACX: CIBCX (2.02) vs FFACX (1.18). CIBCX was incepted earlier than FFACX: CIBCX (25 years) vs FFACX (23 years). FFACX (1.77) is less costly to investors than CIBCX (1.33). CIBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFACX (33.16). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFACX: CIBCX (250) vs FFACX (1000). FFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.75 vs. CIBCX (9.63). CIBCX (33.43) and FFACX (32.11) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CIBCX | FFACX | CIBCX / FFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.75 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.77 | 75% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.027 | 6.984 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 2.96B | 4,330% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 1.18 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.63 | 12.75 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.35 | 37.96 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.43 | 32.11 | 104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.73 | 59.64 | 98% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement