Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBCX vs FFARX
CIBCX vs FFARX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs FFARX
CIBCX vs FFARX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. FFARX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a Hold and FFARX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 130B vs. FFARX (2.96B). CIBCX pays higher dividends than FFARX: CIBCX (1.96) vs FFARX (1.33). CIBCX was incepted earlier than FFARX: CIBCX (26 years) vs FFARX (23 years). CIBCX (1.33) and FFARX (1.27) have similar cost to investors . CIBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFARX (33.16). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFARX: CIBCX (250) vs FFARX (1000). FFARX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.85 vs. CIBCX (9.22). FFARX (36.53) and CIBCX (35.60) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CIBCX | FFARX | CIBCX / FFARX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.25 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.27 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.050 | 9.149 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 130B | 2.96B | 4,386% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.96 | 1.33 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.22 | 10.85 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.93 | 45.01 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.60 | 36.53 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.21 | 64.89 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement