Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBCX vs HRLAX
CIBCX vs HRLAX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs HRLAX
CIBCX vs HRLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. HRLAX commentary
Jul 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a Buy and HRLAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. HRLAX (65.8M). HRLAX pays higher dividends than CIBCX: HRLAX (3.30) vs CIBCX (2.02). CIBCX was incepted earlier than HRLAX: CIBCX (25 years) vs HRLAX (16 years). HRLAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than CIBCX (1.33). HRLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIBCX (50.00). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLAX: CIBCX (250) vs HRLAX (2000). HRLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.34 vs. CIBCX (9.43). HRLAX return over 5 years is better than : 43.42 vs. CIBCX (33.78).
| CIBCX | HRLAX | CIBCX / HRLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.25 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.69 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.275 | 10.581 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 65.8M | 194,529% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 3.30 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.43 | 18.34 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.55 | 37.59 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.78 | 43.42 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.45 | 79.32 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers