Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBCX vs HRLAX
CIBCX vs HRLAX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs HRLAX
CIBCX vs HRLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. HRLAX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a Buy and HRLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. HRLAX (67M). HRLAX pays higher dividends than CIBCX: HRLAX (3.17) vs CIBCX (2.02). CIBCX was incepted earlier than HRLAX: CIBCX (25 years) vs HRLAX (16 years). HRLAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than CIBCX (1.33). HRLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIBCX (50.00). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLAX: CIBCX (250) vs HRLAX (2000). HRLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.98 vs. CIBCX (10.57). HRLAX return over 5 years is better than : 43.92 vs. CIBCX (31.58).
| CIBCX | HRLAX | CIBCX / HRLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.25 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.69 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.400 | 12.759 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 67M | 191,045% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 3.17 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.57 | 21.98 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.03 | 41.44 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.58 | 43.92 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.21 | 91.54 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers