Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBCX vs HRLAX
CIBCX vs HRLAX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs HRLAX
CIBCX vs HRLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. HRLAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a Hold and HRLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. HRLAX (76.3M). HRLAX pays higher dividends than CIBCX: HRLAX (3.07) vs CIBCX (1.96). CIBCX was incepted earlier than HRLAX: CIBCX (26 years) vs HRLAX (16 years). HRLAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than CIBCX (1.33). HRLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIBCX (50.00). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLAX: CIBCX (250) vs HRLAX (2000). HRLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.01 vs. CIBCX (6.85). HRLAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.93 vs. CIBCX (34.82).
| CIBCX | HRLAX | CIBCX / HRLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.25 | 106% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 1.69 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.084 | 15.871 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131B | 76.3M | 171,691% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.96 | 3.07 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.85 | 20.01 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.27 | 42.52 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.82 | 48.93 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.63 | 90.79 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement