Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBCX vs HRLCX
CIBCX vs HRLCX Comparison
Open Charts CIBCX vs HRLCX
CIBCX vs HRLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBCX vs. HRLCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBCX is a Hold and HRLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBCX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. HRLCX (76.3M). HRLCX pays higher dividends than CIBCX: HRLCX (2.48) vs CIBCX (1.96). CIBCX was incepted earlier than HRLCX: CIBCX (26 years) vs HRLCX (16 years). HRLCX (2.54) is less costly to investors than CIBCX (1.33). HRLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIBCX (50.00). CIBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLCX: CIBCX (250) vs HRLCX (2000). HRLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.17 vs. CIBCX (6.85). HRLCX return over 5 years is better than : 43.51 vs. CIBCX (34.82).
| CIBCX | HRLCX | CIBCX / HRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 2.00 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.33 | 2.54 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.084 | 15.352 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131B | 76.3M | 171,691% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.96 | 2.48 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.85 | 19.17 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.27 | 39.43 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.82 | 43.51 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.63 | 78.90 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement