Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBFX vs FBBAX
CIBFX vs FBBAX Comparison
Open Charts CIBFX vs FBBAX
CIBFX vs FBBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBFX vs. FBBAX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBFX is a Hold and FBBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBFX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. FBBAX (61.5M). FBBAX pays higher dividends than CIBFX: FBBAX (3.74) vs CIBFX (2.61). CIBFX was incepted earlier than FBBAX: CIBFX (26 years) vs FBBAX (34 years). FBBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than CIBFX (0.64). CIBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FBBAX (22.00). CIBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FBBAX: CIBFX (250) vs FBBAX (1000). CIBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.57 vs. FBBAX (-3.91). CIBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.71 vs. FBBAX (0.18).
| CIBFX | FBBAX | CIBFX / FBBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.32 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.32 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.463 | -1.520 | -623% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131B | 61.5M | 213,008% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.61 | 3.74 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.57 | -3.91 | -194% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.20 | 4.03 | 1,072% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.71 | 0.18 | 21,735% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.71 | 53.79 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement