Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBFX vs IMRFX
CIBFX vs IMRFX Comparison
Open Charts CIBFX vs IMRFX
CIBFX vs IMRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBFX vs. IMRFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBFX is a Hold and IMRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBFX has more cash in the bank: 130B vs. IMRFX (317M). CIBFX pays higher dividends than IMRFX: CIBFX (2.63) vs IMRFX (2.20). CIBFX was incepted earlier than IMRFX: CIBFX (25 years) vs IMRFX (42 years). IMRFX (1.22) is less costly to investors than CIBFX (0.64). IMRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. CIBFX (50.00). CIBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than IMRFX: CIBFX (250) vs IMRFX (2000). CIBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.78 vs. IMRFX (-0.81). CIBFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.47 vs. IMRFX (-9.96).
| CIBFX | IMRFX | CIBFX / IMRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.22 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.22 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.494 | 7.768 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 130B | 317M | 41,009% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 2.20 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.78 | -0.81 | -1,447% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.82 | 24.46 | 195% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.47 | -9.96 | -416% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.87 | 25.82 | 267% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement