Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBFX vs KTRAX
CIBFX vs KTRAX Comparison
Open Charts CIBFX vs KTRAX
CIBFX vs KTRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBFX vs. KTRAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBFX is a Buy and KTRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBFX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. KTRAX (633M). KTRAX pays higher dividends than CIBFX: KTRAX (4.09) vs CIBFX (2.69). CIBFX was incepted earlier than KTRAX: CIBFX (25 years) vs KTRAX (62 years). KTRAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than CIBFX (0.64). KTRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 191.00 vs. CIBFX (50.00). CIBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than KTRAX: CIBFX (250) vs KTRAX (1000). KTRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.79 vs. CIBFX (10.36). CIBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.26 vs. KTRAX (6.99).
| CIBFX | KTRAX | CIBFX / KTRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.90 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.90 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 62 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.429 | 9.145 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 633M | 20,221% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.69 | 4.09 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.36 | 12.79 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.12 | 22.69 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.26 | 6.99 | 533% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.58 | 53.71 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement