Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBFX vs KTRAX
CIBFX vs KTRAX Comparison
Open Charts CIBFX vs KTRAX
CIBFX vs KTRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBFX vs. KTRAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBFX is a Hold and KTRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBFX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. KTRAX (631M). KTRAX pays higher dividends than CIBFX: KTRAX (4.02) vs CIBFX (2.61). CIBFX was incepted earlier than KTRAX: CIBFX (26 years) vs KTRAX (63 years). KTRAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than CIBFX (0.64). KTRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 191.00 vs. CIBFX (50.00). CIBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than KTRAX: CIBFX (250) vs KTRAX (1000). CIBFX (7.54) and KTRAX (7.52) have marching annual gain over last year. CIBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.68 vs. KTRAX (6.24).
| CIBFX | KTRAX | CIBFX / KTRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.90 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.90 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 63 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.599 | 9.365 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131B | 631M | 20,761% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.61 | 4.02 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.54 | 7.52 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.11 | 24.86 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.68 | 6.24 | 620% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.63 | 54.19 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers