Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBFX vs KTRAX
CIBFX vs KTRAX Comparison
Open Charts CIBFX vs KTRAX
CIBFX vs KTRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBFX vs. KTRAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBFX is a Hold and KTRAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBFX has more cash in the bank: 130B vs. KTRAX (639M). KTRAX pays higher dividends than CIBFX: KTRAX (4.10) vs CIBFX (2.63). CIBFX was incepted earlier than KTRAX: CIBFX (25 years) vs KTRAX (63 years). KTRAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than CIBFX (0.64). KTRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 191.00 vs. CIBFX (50.00). CIBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than KTRAX: CIBFX (250) vs KTRAX (1000). KTRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.42 vs. CIBFX (11.78). CIBFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.47 vs. KTRAX (8.50).
| CIBFX | KTRAX | CIBFX / KTRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.90 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.90 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 63 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.494 | 10.684 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 130B | 639M | 20,344% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.63 | 4.10 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.78 | 12.42 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.82 | 28.22 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.47 | 8.50 | 488% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.87 | 53.81 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement