Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBR vs HACK
CIBR vs HACK Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs HACK
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$71.05
Change-$0.47 (-0.66%)
Volume$379.06K
Net Assets9.22B
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
Price$80.98
Change+$1.18 (+1.48%)
Volume$89.5K
Net Assets2.14B
CIBR vs HACK Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. HACK commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Buy and HACK is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 9.23B vs. HACK (2.14B). CIBR has a higher annual dividend yield than HACK: CIBR (11.985) vs HACK (8.713). CIBR was incepted earlier than HACK: CIBR (10 years) vs HACK (11 years). CIBR (0.59) and HACK (0.60) have comparable expense ratios . HACK has a higher turnover CIBR (39.00) vs CIBR (39.00).
| CIBR | HACK | CIBR / HACK | |
| Gain YTD | 11.985 | 8.713 | 138% |
| Net Assets | 9.23B | 2.14B | 430% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.60 | 98% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 50.00 | 78% |
| Yield | 0.24 | 0.14 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 89% | 9 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 75% Closely correlated | +2.16% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 75% Closely correlated | +4.80% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 73% Closely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 71% Closely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| S - CIBR | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
More | ||||
HACK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HACK has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HACK jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HACK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HACK | 100% | +1.48% | ||
| ZS - HACK | 75% Closely correlated | +2.16% | ||
| NET - HACK | 72% Closely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| CRWD - HACK | 71% Closely correlated | +4.80% | ||
| CYBR - HACK | 71% Closely correlated | +2.00% | ||
| S - HACK | 66% Closely correlated | -0.15% | ||
More | ||||