Ad is loading...
CIBR vs HACK
CIBR vs HACK Comparison
Open Charts CIBR vs HACK
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$61.17
Change-$3.28 (-5.09%)
Volume$10.15K
Net Assets7.99B
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
Price$69.14
Change-$4.10 (-5.60%)
Volume$837
Net Assets1.97B
CIBR vs HACK Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBR vs. HACK commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and HACK is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 7.99B vs. HACK (1.97B). CIBR has a higher annual dividend yield than HACK: CIBR (1.583) vs HACK (-1.678). CIBR was incepted earlier than HACK: CIBR (10 years) vs HACK (10 years). CIBR (0.59) and HACK (0.60) have comparable expense ratios . HACK has a higher turnover CIBR (39.00) vs CIBR (39.00).
| CIBR | HACK | CIBR / HACK | |
| Gain YTD | 1.583 | -1.678 | -94% |
| Net Assets | 7.99B | 1.97B | 405% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.60 | 98% |
| Turnover | 39.00 | 50.00 | 78% |
| Yield | 0.26 | 0.14 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| CIBR | HACK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | +1.46% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 72% Closely correlated | +2.51% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 70% Closely correlated | +2.97% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 68% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| S - CIBR | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
More | ||||
HACK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HACK has been closely correlated with CYBR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HACK jumps, then CYBR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HACK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HACK | 100% | +1.22% | ||
| CYBR - HACK | 71% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| ZS - HACK | 69% Closely correlated | +2.97% | ||
| CRWD - HACK | 67% Closely correlated | +2.51% | ||
| S - HACK | 66% Closely correlated | +1.29% | ||
| NET - HACK | 65% Loosely correlated | +3.36% | ||
More | ||||