CIBR
Price
$92.92
Change
+$2.25 (+2.48%)
Updated
Jul 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
13.97B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HACK
Price
$110.11
Change
+$3.14 (+2.94%)
Updated
Jul 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.64B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIBR vs HACK

CIBR vs HACK Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) vs. Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK)

Key Takeaways

  • First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) both provide targeted exposure to the cybersecurity sector but differ in index methodology, resulting in variations in holdings concentration and diversification.
  • CIBR tracks the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index with approximately 42-44 holdings and an expense ratio of 0.58%, while HACK follows the Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index with 22-24 holdings and a 0.60% expense ratio.
  • CIBR offers broader diversification across cybersecurity companies, whereas HACK maintains a more concentrated portfolio that can lead to higher volatility tied to top holdings performance.
  • Both ETFs employ passive index-tracking strategies with quarterly rebalancing, focusing exclusively on companies engaged in cybersecurity hardware, software, and services.
  • Structural differences position CIBR for investors seeking wider exposure within the theme, while HACK suits those comfortable with higher concentration risk for potentially amplified sector returns during favorable cycles.
  • Expense ratios remain competitive within the thematic ETF category, though CIBR's slightly lower cost supports long-term holding efficiency.

Introduction

Cybersecurity remains a critical growth area amid rising digital threats, regulatory scrutiny, and enterprise spending on data protection. First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) represent two prominent vehicles for investors seeking pure-play exposure to this theme. They do not compete directly as broad market funds but serve as alternative strategies targeting similar investor goals of capitalizing on cybersecurity innovation and adoption. This comparison highlights their structural distinctions to aid informed allocation decisions within a specialized sector.

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) Overview

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the performance of the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. The index selects companies classified as cybersecurity firms by the Consumer Technology Association (CTA), spanning software, networking, and select industrial applications. The fund holds approximately 42-44 securities, with top holdings including CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. (CRWD), Fortinet Inc. (FTNT), and Cisco Systems Inc. (CSCO). Sector allocations concentrate in information technology, particularly software and services, with limited exposure outside pure cybersecurity plays. CIBR features an expense ratio of 0.58% and operates as an open-end fund with liquidity-weighted index methodology. It rebalances periodically to maintain alignment with index constituents, emphasizing established and emerging cybersecurity providers.

Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) Overview

Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund designed to replicate the Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index. This index focuses on companies deriving significant revenue from cybersecurity products and services. The fund maintains a more concentrated portfolio of 22-24 holdings, with prominent positions in Palo Alto Networks Inc. (PANW), CrowdStrike Holdings Inc. (CRWD), Cisco Systems Inc. (CSCO), and Fortinet Inc. (FTNT). Allocations remain heavily weighted toward technology, especially software and infrastructure providers. HACK carries an expense ratio of 0.60% and follows a rules-based selection process with periodic rebalancing. Its structure emphasizes a select group of leading cybersecurity firms, resulting in higher concentration compared to broader thematic peers.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The cybersecurity sector benefits from sustained enterprise demand driven by escalating cyber threats, cloud migration, and regulatory requirements such as data privacy mandates. Macroeconomic factors including interest rate environments influence capital allocation toward growth-oriented technology subsectors. Geopolitical tensions and supply chain digitization further support spending on secure infrastructure. Risks include potential slowdowns in IT budgets during economic uncertainty, intense competition among providers, and valuation compression in high-growth names. Both ETFs operate within this dynamic landscape, where innovation cycles and adoption rates determine relative performance across market cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have exhibited sensitivity to technology sector rotations and earnings trends among leading cybersecurity providers. CIBR's broader holdings base has historically provided more stable exposure during periods of sector-wide momentum, while HACK's concentration has amplified returns when top constituents outperformed. Relative positioning reflects differences in volatility profiles, with the more diversified CIBR often demonstrating lower drawdowns in challenging environments. Interest rate expectations and broader equity sentiment continue to influence flows into thematic cybersecurity strategies, favoring funds with efficient cost structures and consistent index tracking.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener for data-driven insights.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest preference to First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Its lower expense ratio, greater number of holdings, and enhanced diversification profile offer a more balanced risk exposure within the cybersecurity theme while maintaining strong alignment with sector momentum. HACK remains competitive for investors prioritizing concentrated leadership exposure, though the probability-weighted edge favors CIBR's efficiency and breadth in prevailing market conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CIBR vs. HACK commentary
Jul 07, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and HACK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 14B vs. HACK (2.64B). HACK has a higher annual dividend yield than CIBR: HACK (33.097) vs CIBR (19.779). CIBR was incepted earlier than HACK: CIBR (11 years) vs HACK (12 years). CIBR (0.58) and HACK (0.60) have comparable expense ratios . HACK has a higher turnover CIBR (21.00) vs CIBR (21.00).
CIBRHACKCIBR / HACK
Gain YTD19.77933.09760%
Net Assets14B2.64B530%
Total Expense Ratio0.580.6097%
Turnover21.0025.0084%
Yield0.440.06764%
Fund Existence11 years12 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIBRHACK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIBR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HACK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KRYP17.500.93
+5.59%
Proshares Coindesk 20 Crypto ETF
FELV40.630.45
+1.12%
Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF
FISR25.510.02
+0.08%
State Street® Fixed Inc Sect RotationETF
IBBQ32.23N/A
N/A
Invesco Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF
EMCS44.40-0.96
-2.12%
Xtrackers MSCI EMs Select ETF

CIBR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIBR
1D Price
Change %
CIBR100%
N/A
CRWD - CIBR
86%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
OKTA - CIBR
79%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
PANW - CIBR
79%
Closely correlated
-1.13%
TENB - CIBR
71%
Closely correlated
+1.85%
RDWR - CIBR
68%
Closely correlated
-3.48%
More

HACK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HACK has been closely correlated with RBRK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HACK jumps, then RBRK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HACK
1D Price
Change %
HACK100%
-0.12%
RBRK - HACK
69%
Closely correlated
+1.99%
NET - HACK
68%
Closely correlated
-1.58%
S - HACK
66%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
ATEN - HACK
61%
Loosely correlated
-4.47%
CVLT - HACK
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.01%
More