CIBR
Price
$84.54
Change
+$0.31 (+0.37%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Net Assets
12.84B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IGV
Price
$89.09
Change
-$0.07 (-0.08%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Net Assets
13.74B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIBR vs IGV

CIBR vs IGV Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) vs. iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV)

Key Takeaways

  • CIBR offers targeted exposure to cybersecurity firms via the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, with 42 holdings and a 0.58% expense ratio, while IGV provides broader North American software coverage through 111 holdings at a lower 0.39% expense ratio.
  • Both ETFs exhibit high concentration, with top 10 holdings comprising ~59% of assets; CIBR emphasizes security specialists like PANW and CRWD, while IGV includes diversified software giants such as ORCL and MSFT.
  • CIBR's sector allocation is heavily tilted toward technology (94%) with industrials exposure, contrasting IGV's focus on application software (58%) and systems software (38%).
  • In recent market cycles, CIBR has shown greater resilience with positive YTD returns amid cybersecurity demand, outperforming IGV which faced pressure from broader software sector rotation.
  • CIBR carries higher costs and concentration risk but benefits from thematic tailwinds; IGV offers cost efficiency and liquidity for software sector plays.
  • Both are passive index-tracking ETFs, with CIBR featuring quarterly rebalancing and semi-annual reconstitution for liquidity-weighted cybersecurity focus.

Introduction

In the evolving technology landscape, investors seek targeted exposure to high-growth subsectors like cybersecurity and software. CIBR and IGV represent complementary yet distinct strategies within tech. CIBR delivers pure-play cybersecurity via companies combating digital threats, while IGV captures broader software innovation across applications and systems. These ETFs appeal to those eyeing sector rotation amid AI-driven demand, rising cyber risks, and enterprise digitization. Though not direct competitors, they offer alternative paths to tech growth: thematic specialization versus diversified software breadth. Comparing them highlights trade-offs in focus, cost, and risk for portfolio positioning in today's macro environment.

First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) Overview

The First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) is a passive ETF that tracks the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index, focusing on companies in the cybersecurity segment of technology and industrials sectors. Launched in 2015, it holds approximately 42 stocks, selected and liquidity-weighted with quarterly rebalancing and semi-annual reconstitution to maintain exposure.

Top holdings include AVGO (9.58%), PANW (8.83%), CRWD (8.79%), CSCO (8.44%), and FTNT (7.12%), comprising nearly 59% of assets. Sector allocation skews to technology (93.95%), industrials (3.46%), and communication services (2.59%).

With a 0.58% expense ratio, CIBR provides thematic purity for investors prioritizing cybersecurity amid escalating threats, distinguishing it through its niche index methodology that emphasizes global firms in hardware, software, and services.

iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) Overview

The iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) passively tracks the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index, targeting U.S.- and Canadian-listed software firms plus select interactive media and entertainment equities. Inception in 2001 underscores its established presence, with 111 holdings and semi-annual reviews plus quarterly weight capping at 8.5% for diversification.

Leading holdings are ORCL (9.65%), MSFT (8.24%), PLTR (7.30%), CRM (6.33%), and PANW (6.25%), accounting for about 59% of the portfolio. Breakdown emphasizes application software (58.23%) and systems software (38.35%), with minor interactive segments.

At a 0.39% expense ratio, IGV suits broad software exposure, non-diversified by design yet balanced via caps, ideal for capturing enterprise and cloud-driven innovation.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Cybersecurity and software sectors thrive amid AI proliferation, geopolitical tensions, and regulatory mandates like GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation). Rising threats—ransomware, state-sponsored attacks—fuel cybersecurity spending, projected to surge with AI both enabling defenses and novel risks. Software benefits from cloud migration and digital transformation, though faces valuation pressures from interest rate shifts.

Capital flows favor resilient themes; cybersecurity draws steady enterprise budgets as non-discretionary, while software contends with earnings cycles and M&A (mergers and acquisitions). Macro drivers include U.S.-China frictions impacting supply chains, plus quantum computing prep. Risks encompass concentration in mega-caps, talent shortages, and policy volatility, positioning both ETFs amid tech's durable growth trajectory.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent months, CIBR has demonstrated resilience with positive YTD gains around 5-6%, buoyed by cybersecurity momentum amid threat surges and AI security needs, contrasting IGV's YTD declines near -14% from broader software selloffs tied to growth stock rotation and earnings misses. In recent market cycles, CIBR's beta near 0.71 signals lower volatility relative to broader tech, benefiting from sector tailwinds like regulatory pushes.

IGV, with a beta around 1.11 and higher standard deviation (~24% over 3 years), amplifies tech swings but captures upside in software innovation cycles. Relative positioning favors CIBR in defensive rotations, while IGV leads in risk-on environments; overlapping holdings like PANW and CRWD highlight shared drivers, yet CIBR's purity yields steadier trends amid macro shifts.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Explore it today to uncover hidden gems in sectors like cybersecurity and software.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors CIBR with moderate conviction, citing its thematic focus on high-momentum cybersecurity, trend consistency amid rising threats, and diversification within a resilient niche, despite elevated costs. IGV's broader exposure and efficiency appeal in software rallies, but recent relative underperformance tips the scale toward CIBR's structural edge in the current environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CIBR vs. IGV commentary
Jun 19, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBR is a Hold and IGV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IGV has more net assets: 13.7B vs. CIBR (12.8B). CIBR has a higher annual dividend yield than IGV: CIBR (18.091) vs IGV (-15.624). CIBR was incepted earlier than IGV: CIBR (11 years) vs IGV (25 years). IGV (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than CIBR (0.58). CIBR (21.00) and IGV (20.00) have matching turnover.
CIBRIGVCIBR / IGV
Gain YTD18.091-15.624-116%
Net Assets12.8B13.7B93%
Total Expense Ratio0.580.39149%
Turnover21.0020.00105%
Yield0.460.00-
Fund Existence11 years25 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIBRIGV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIBR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IGV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIB84.951.84
+2.21%
ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology
HYBB46.61-0.13
-0.27%
iShares BB Rated Corporate Bond ETF
FWD142.50-0.42
-0.29%
AB Disruptors ETF
IDYN30.28-0.10
-0.32%
iShares Intl Eq Fac Rotation Act ETF
RGEF34.57-0.16
-0.46%
Rockefeller Global Equity ETF

CIBR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIBR
1D Price
Change %
CIBR100%
-1.00%
CRWD - CIBR
85%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
PANW - CIBR
79%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
OKTA - CIBR
78%
Closely correlated
-2.79%
TENB - CIBR
72%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
RBRK - CIBR
68%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
More