Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBYX vs NLGAX
CIBYX vs NLGAX Comparison
Open Charts CIBYX vs NLGAX
CIBYX vs NLGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBYX vs. NLGAX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBYX is a Hold and NLGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBYX has more cash in the bank: 840M vs. NLGAX (335M). CIBYX pays higher dividends than NLGAX: CIBYX (4.20) vs NLGAX (2.81). CIBYX was incepted earlier than NLGAX: CIBYX (9 years) vs NLGAX (30 years). NLGAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CIBYX (0.65). NLGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CIBYX (12.00). NLGAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIBYX: NLGAX (2000) vs CIBYX (1000000). NLGAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.84 vs. CIBYX (12.59). CIBYX return over 5 years is better than : 15.85 vs. NLGAX (9.84).
| CIBYX | NLGAX | CIBYX / NLGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.93 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.93 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.043 | 5.441 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 840M | 335M | 251% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.20 | 2.81 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.59 | 13.84 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.84 | 32.07 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.85 | 9.84 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 33.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers