Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIBYX vs NLGAX
CIBYX vs NLGAX Comparison
Open Charts CIBYX vs NLGAX
CIBYX vs NLGAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIBYX vs. NLGAX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIBYX is a Hold and NLGAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBYX has more cash in the bank: 810M vs. NLGAX (323M). CIBYX pays higher dividends than NLGAX: CIBYX (4.21) vs NLGAX (2.91). CIBYX was incepted earlier than NLGAX: CIBYX (10 years) vs NLGAX (30 years). NLGAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than CIBYX (0.65). NLGAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CIBYX (12.00). NLGAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIBYX: NLGAX (2000) vs CIBYX (1000000). CIBYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.78 vs. NLGAX (4.89). CIBYX return over 5 years is better than : 14.35 vs. NLGAX (8.65).
| CIBYX | NLGAX | CIBYX / NLGAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.93 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.93 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.901 | 3.047 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 2000 | 50,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 810M | 323M | 251% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.21 | 2.91 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.78 | 4.89 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.28 | 31.44 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.35 | 8.65 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.01 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement