Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CICAX vs FWWMX
CICAX vs FWWMX Comparison
Open Charts CICAX vs FWWMX
CICAX vs FWWMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 219B vs. CICAX (184B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than CICAX: FWWMX (1.44) vs CICAX (0.81). CICAX was incepted earlier than FWWMX: CICAX (24 years) vs FWWMX (6 years). CICAX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). CICAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). CICAX (250) and FWWMX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CICAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.44 vs. FWWMX (5.76). CICAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.63 vs. FWWMX (30.81).
| CICAX | FWWMX | CICAX / FWWMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.31 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.31 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.982 | 3.857 | 233% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 184B | 219B | 84% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 1.44 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.44 | 5.76 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.64 | 29.16 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.63 | 30.81 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.59 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement