Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CICAX vs FWWMX
CICAX vs FWWMX Comparison
Open Charts CICAX vs FWWMX
CICAX vs FWWMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CICAX vs. FWWMX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CICAX is a Buy and FWWMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. CICAX (187B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than CICAX: FWWMX (1.41) vs CICAX (0.80). CICAX was incepted earlier than FWWMX: CICAX (25 years) vs FWWMX (6 years). CICAX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). CICAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). CICAX (250) and FWWMX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CICAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.93 vs. FWWMX (2.09). CICAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.42 vs. FWWMX (30.17).
| CICAX | FWWMX | CICAX / FWWMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.31 | 190% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.31 | 190% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.915 | 4.506 | 220% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 187B | 218B | 86% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.41 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.93 | 2.09 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.29 | 30.23 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.42 | 30.17 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.05 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers