Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CICEX vs FWWMX
CICEX vs FWWMX Comparison
Open Charts CICEX vs FWWMX
CICEX vs FWWMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CICEX vs. FWWMX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CICEX is a Hold and FWWMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. CICEX (186B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than CICEX: FWWMX (1.41) vs CICEX (0.58). CICEX was incepted earlier than FWWMX: CICEX (25 years) vs FWWMX (6 years). CICEX (0.83) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). CICEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FWWMX (32.00). CICEX (250) and FWWMX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CICEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.97 vs. FWWMX (5.48). CICEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.23 vs. FWWMX (29.55).
| CICEX | FWWMX | CICEX / FWWMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.31 | 268% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 0.31 | 268% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.896 | 5.850 | 186% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 186B | 218B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.58 | 1.41 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.97 | 5.48 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.34 | 31.74 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.23 | 29.55 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers