Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CICFX vs FWWMX
CICFX vs FWWMX Comparison
Open Charts CICFX vs FWWMX
CICFX vs FWWMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWWMX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. CICFX (186B). FWWMX pays higher dividends than CICFX: FWWMX (1.40) vs CICFX (0.93). CICFX was incepted earlier than FWWMX: CICFX (24 years) vs FWWMX (6 years). CICFX (0.68) is less costly to investors than FWWMX (0.31). CICFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 34.00 vs. FWWMX (29.00). CICFX (250) and FWWMX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. CICFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.54 vs. FWWMX (8.15). CICFX return over 5 years is better than : 46.11 vs. FWWMX (30.36).
| CICFX | FWWMX | CICFX / FWWMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.31 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.31 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.637 | 1.616 | 535% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 186B | 218B | 85% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.40 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.54 | 8.15 | 166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.37 | 30.60 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.11 | 30.36 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.78 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GSPQX | 19.88 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs US Eq Div and Premium C | |||
| HLMOX | 9.38 | N/A | N/A |
| Harding Loevner Frontier Emerg Mkts Inv | |||
| BIRIX | 26.52 | N/A | N/A |
| BlackRock Sust Awr Advtg Lg Cp Cr Instl | |||
| GSIQX | 22.61 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs GQG Ptnrs Intl Opps R | |||
| GABPX | 54.18 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Equity Income P | |||