It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CIEN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileINFN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CIEN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INFN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
CIEN (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а -2.61% price change this week, while INFN (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was +0.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -3.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.54%.
CIEN is expected to report earnings on Mar 06, 2025.
INFN is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
CIEN | INFN | CIEN / INFN | |
Capitalization | 7.11B | 1.5B | 473% |
EBITDA | 532M | 120M | 443% |
Gain YTD | 94.135 | 38.947 | 242% |
P/E Ratio | 31.94 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 4.37B | 1.65B | 266% |
Total Cash | 1.37B | 163M | 841% |
Total Debt | 1.61B | 738M | 218% |
CIEN | INFN | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 97 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 48 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
INFN's Valuation (83) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as CIEN (86). This means that INFN’s stock grew similarly to CIEN’s over the last 12 months.
CIEN's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is significantly better than the same rating for INFN (97). This means that CIEN’s stock grew significantly faster than INFN’s over the last 12 months.
CIEN's SMR Rating (87) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as INFN (98). This means that CIEN’s stock grew similarly to INFN’s over the last 12 months.
CIEN's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is in the same range as INFN (44). This means that CIEN’s stock grew similarly to INFN’s over the last 12 months.
CIEN's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Telecommunications Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for INFN (48). This means that CIEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than INFN’s over the last 12 months.
CIEN | INFN | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago65% | 4 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago67% | 4 days ago75% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago67% | 4 days ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago66% | 4 days ago71% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago69% | 4 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago71% | 8 days ago75% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago66% | 5 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago62% | 4 days ago75% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% | 4 days ago75% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
UPAR | 13.12 | 0.14 | +1.06% |
UPAR Ultra Risk Parity ETF | |||
SDG | 72.18 | 0.39 | +0.54% |
iShares MSCI Global Sust Dev Goals ETF | |||
BSCV | 16.10 | 0.05 | +0.31% |
Invesco BulletShares 2031 Corp Bd ETF | |||
JIRE | 59.83 | -0.31 | -0.52% |
JPMorgan International Rsrch Enh Eq ETF | |||
DWSH | 7.51 | -0.08 | -1.05% |
AdvisorShares Dorsey Wright Short ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIEN has been loosely correlated with LITE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CIEN jumps, then LITE could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIEN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CIEN | 100% | +1.85% | ||
LITE - CIEN | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.82% | ||
ZBRA - CIEN | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.99% | ||
VIAV - CIEN | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
HPE - CIEN | 35% Loosely correlated | +4.09% | ||
CSCO - CIEN | 33% Poorly correlated | +1.54% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INFN has been loosely correlated with CIEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if INFN jumps, then CIEN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INFN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
INFN | 100% | +0.61% | ||
CIEN - INFN | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.85% | ||
ADTN - INFN | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
KN - INFN | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.72% | ||
ZBRA - INFN | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.99% | ||
ERIC - INFN | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.12% | ||
More |