CIFR
Price
$4.08
Change
+$0.11 (+2.77%)
Updated
Feb 28 closing price
Capitalization
1.45B
71 days until earnings call
HUT
Price
$14.75
Change
+$0.34 (+2.36%)
Updated
Feb 28 closing price
Capitalization
985.18M
Ad is loading...

CIFR vs HUT

Header iconCIFR vs HUT Comparison
Open Charts CIFR vs HUTBanner chart's image
Cipher Mining
Price$4.08
Change+$0.11 (+2.77%)
Volume$39.09M
Capitalization1.45B
Hut 8
Price$14.75
Change+$0.34 (+2.36%)
Volume$6.65M
Capitalization985.18M
CIFR vs HUT Comparison Chart
Loading...
CIFR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIFR vs. HUT commentary
Mar 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIFR is a Hold and HUT is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 03, 2025
Stock price -- (CIFR: $4.08 vs. HUT: $14.75)
Brand notoriety: CIFR and HUT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIFR: 291% vs. HUT: 135%
Market capitalization -- CIFR: $1.45B vs. HUT: $985.18M
CIFR [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $1.45B. HUT’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $985.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIFR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CIFR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HUT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CIFR and HUT are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIFR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIFR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HUT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CIFR and HUT are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CIFR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -25.68% price change this week, while HUT (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -17.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -3.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

CIFR is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

HUT is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-3.84% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIFR($1.45B) has a higher market cap than HUT($985M). CIFR YTD gains are higher at: -12.069 vs. HUT (-28.014). CIFR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 39.7M vs. HUT (-80.09M). CIFR has more cash in the bank: 86.1M vs. HUT (21.1M). CIFR has less debt than HUT: CIFR (22M) vs HUT (79.5M). CIFR has higher revenues than HUT: CIFR (127M) vs HUT (77M).
CIFRHUTCIFR / HUT
Capitalization1.45B985M147%
EBITDA39.7M-80.09M-50%
Gain YTD-12.069-28.01443%
P/E RatioN/A12.84-
Revenue127M77M165%
Total Cash86.1M21.1M408%
Total Debt22M79.5M28%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HUT: Fundamental Ratings
HUT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
82
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIFRHUT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CIFR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRGMX19.810.32
+1.64%
Nuveen Mid Cap Growth Retire
UIISX18.460.21
+1.15%
Victory Income Stock Institutional
JVMRX27.520.28
+1.03%
JHancock Disciplined Value Mid Cap R6
MMYAX8.540.07
+0.83%
MassMutual Small Company Value A
PICRX39.11-0.06
-0.15%
Putnam International Capital Opp R

CIFR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIFR has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIFR jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIFR
1D Price
Change %
CIFR100%
+2.77%
RIOT - CIFR
78%
Closely correlated
+7.16%
CLSK - CIFR
74%
Closely correlated
+6.39%
HUT - CIFR
73%
Closely correlated
+2.36%
BITF - CIFR
72%
Closely correlated
+6.42%
WULF - CIFR
70%
Closely correlated
+16.07%
More

HUT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUT has been closely correlated with HIVE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HUT jumps, then HIVE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUT
1D Price
Change %
HUT100%
+2.36%
HIVE - HUT
80%
Closely correlated
+1.47%
RIOT - HUT
76%
Closely correlated
+7.16%
BITF - HUT
76%
Closely correlated
+6.42%
BTBT - HUT
74%
Closely correlated
+3.36%
CIFR - HUT
73%
Closely correlated
+2.77%
More