Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIGEX vs RNPAX
CIGEX vs RNPAX Comparison
Open Charts CIGEX vs RNPAX
CIGEX vs RNPAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIGEX vs. RNPAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIGEX is a Buy and RNPAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPAX has more cash in the bank: 170B vs. CIGEX (188M). RNPAX pays higher dividends than CIGEX: RNPAX (0.37) vs CIGEX (0.00). CIGEX was incepted earlier than RNPAX: CIGEX (19 years) vs RNPAX (24 years). RNPAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than CIGEX (1.25). CIGEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 114.00 vs. RNPAX (23.00). RNPAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIGEX: RNPAX (250) vs CIGEX (1000000). RNPAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.41 vs. CIGEX (1.96). CIGEX return over 5 years is better than : 12.14 vs. RNPAX (7.09).
| CIGEX | RNPAX | CIGEX / RNPAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.49 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 1.49 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.903 | 4.455 | 290% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 188M | 170B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.37 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.96 | 5.41 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.76 | 29.24 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.14 | 7.09 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.99 | 92.75 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers