CIGI
Price
$142.37
Change
+$0.64 (+0.45%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
6.12B
5 days until earnings call
MHIVF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
12.93M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CIGI vs MHIVF

Header iconCIGI vs MHIVF Comparison
Open Charts CIGI vs MHIVFBanner chart's image
Colliers International Group
Price$142.37
Change+$0.64 (+0.45%)
Volume$84.66K
Capitalization6.12B
Invesque
Price$0.09
Change-$0.01 (-10.00%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization12.93M
CIGI vs MHIVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CIGI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MHIVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CIGI vs. MHIVF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIGI is a Buy and MHIVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CIGI: $142.37 vs. MHIVF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: CIGI and MHIVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CIGI: 59% vs. MHIVF: 27%
Market capitalization -- CIGI: $6.12B vs. MHIVF: $12.93M
CIGI [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $6.12B. MHIVF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $12.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CIGI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMHIVF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CIGI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MHIVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CIGI is a better buy in the long-term than MHIVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CIGI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MHIVF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CIGI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MHIVF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CIGI is a better buy in the short-term than MHIVF.

Price Growth

CIGI (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +2.92% price change this week, while MHIVF (@Real Estate Development) price change was -5.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

CIGI is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.20% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIGI($6.12B) has a higher market cap than MHIVF($12.9M). MHIVF YTD gains are higher at: 21.429 vs. CIGI (4.827). CIGI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 509M vs. MHIVF (-16.75M). CIGI has more cash in the bank: 205M vs. MHIVF (19.8M). MHIVF has less debt than CIGI: MHIVF (617M) vs CIGI (2.14B). CIGI has higher revenues than MHIVF: CIGI (4.34B) vs MHIVF (197M).
CIGIMHIVFCIGI / MHIVF
Capitalization6.12B12.9M47,442%
EBITDA509M-16.75M-3,040%
Gain YTD4.82721.42923%
P/E Ratio84.65N/A-
Revenue4.34B197M2,201%
Total Cash205M19.8M1,035%
Total Debt2.14B617M346%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CIGI vs MHIVF: Fundamental Ratings
CIGI
MHIVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1811
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35100
SMR RATING
1..100
6396
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4863
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8152
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MHIVF's Valuation (70) in the null industry is in the same range as CIGI (93) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that MHIVF’s stock grew similarly to CIGI’s over the last 12 months.

CIGI's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MHIVF (100) in the null industry. This means that CIGI’s stock grew somewhat faster than MHIVF’s over the last 12 months.

CIGI's SMR Rating (63) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MHIVF (96) in the null industry. This means that CIGI’s stock grew somewhat faster than MHIVF’s over the last 12 months.

CIGI's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as MHIVF (63) in the null industry. This means that CIGI’s stock grew similarly to MHIVF’s over the last 12 months.

MHIVF's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CIGI (81) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that MHIVF’s stock grew similarly to CIGI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CIGIMHIVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CIGI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MHIVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSPAX18.00N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs US Eq Div and Premium A
LOMAX15.83N/A
N/A
Edgar Lomax Value
LRSQX12.99N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value R2
CCCAX6.28N/A
N/A
Center Coast Brookfield Midstream Foc A
CNWAX89.13-0.42
-0.47%
American Funds New World 529A

CIGI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIGI has been closely correlated with CBRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIGI jumps, then CBRE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CIGI
1D Price
Change %
CIGI100%
+0.45%
CBRE - CIGI
79%
Closely correlated
+2.06%
JLL - CIGI
77%
Closely correlated
+1.50%
NMRK - CIGI
73%
Closely correlated
+0.97%
CWK - CIGI
70%
Closely correlated
+1.80%
FSV - CIGI
64%
Loosely correlated
+3.13%
More

MHIVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MHIVF and KWHAF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MHIVF and KWHAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MHIVF
1D Price
Change %
MHIVF100%
-19.05%
KWHAF - MHIVF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MODVF - MHIVF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
AANNF - MHIVF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIGI - MHIVF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
MGAWY - MHIVF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More