Colliers International Group and Newmark Group occupy adjacent lanes within the commercial real estate services industry, yet their strategic profiles diverge in ways that matter significantly to investors. CIGI has evolved into a diversified professional services and investment management powerhouse with a global footprint, while NMRK remains a more focused capital markets and advisory specialist. This comparison is particularly relevant for investors evaluating exposure to the commercial real estate cycle, weighing trade-offs between diversification and operational efficiency, or assessing how two different business models perform under shifting macroeconomic conditions. Understanding where each company stands on growth trajectory, profitability, risk profile, and market positioning can help clarify which stock aligns with a given investment thesis.
Colliers International Group Inc. (CIGI) is a Toronto-headquartered global professional services and investment management company operating through three distinct platforms: Real Estate Services, Engineering, and Investment Management (the latter now branded under Harrison Street Asset Management). With annual revenues of $5.56 billion, approximately 24,000 professionals, and more than $108 billion in assets under management (AUM), Colliers has built a 30-year track record of consistent expansion, delivering roughly 20% compound annual returns for shareholders over that period.
In full-year 2025, CIGI reported revenue growth of 15%, Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) of $732.5 million — up 14% year-over-year — and Adjusted EPS (earnings per share) of $6.58, also reflecting 14% growth. A defining characteristic of the Colliers model is that more than 70% of earnings come from recurring revenue streams, including engineering services, property management, valuation, loan servicing, and investment management fees. Recent weeks have seen the company press forward with strategic acquisitions, including the landmark agreement to acquire Ayesa Engineering, which meaningfully expands its European engineering footprint. Despite this operational momentum, CIGI shares have experienced notable pressure in 2026, with the stock declining substantially from year-end 2025 levels amid broader sector rotation and macroeconomic uncertainty. Analysts remain broadly constructive, with consensus price targets suggesting significant upside from current levels.
Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK) is a New York-based commercial real estate advisory firm serving large institutional investors, global corporations, and other owners and occupiers. The company provides a range of services including investment sales, debt and structured finance, agency leasing, property management, valuation and advisory, and loan servicing. With annual revenues of approximately $3.29 billion and roughly 8,800 professionals, Newmark operates at a smaller scale than Colliers but has carved out a strong reputation in capital markets and high-profile transaction advisory.
Newmark's performance trajectory in recent quarters has been impressive. The company consistently raised its full-year 2025 outlook throughout the year as results exceeded expectations, with third-quarter 2025 revenues climbing 25.9% to $863.5 million and Adjusted EPS rising 27.3% to $0.42. Year-to-date through the third quarter, Adjusted EBITDA expanded 32.8% to $348.4 million. Notably, all of this growth was organic, as the company made no acquisitions during the trailing twelve-month period. Management has targeted approximately 100 basis points of annual Adjusted EBITDA margin expansion for both 2025 and 2026. The company also expanded its recurring-revenue capabilities through the acquisition of RealFoundations, a management consulting firm serving institutional real estate clients. Like its peer, NMRK has faced selling pressure in 2026, though its year-to-date decline has been less severe than CIGI's. The stock's lower valuation multiples and higher dividend yield of approximately 1.55% have provided some relative support.
In an environment where commercial real estate stocks face shifting sentiment and macroeconomic crosscurrents, many traders are turning to data-driven tools to navigate the volatility. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of the platform's highest-performing AI trading bots — chosen from a library of hundreds of bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across equities, ETFs, and other instruments. These bots employ diverse strategies, from 5-minute and 15-minute high-frequency models to longer-term swing and trend-following approaches powered by Tickeron's proprietary Financial Learning Models (FLMs). Performance metrics vary widely by strategy, with some recently highlighted bots delivering win rates exceeding 65% and annualized returns in the triple digits under favorable conditions. Each bot has its own trading style, risk parameters, and ticker universe, meaning the Trending AI Robots list serves as a continuously updated snapshot of which automated strategies are best aligned with prevailing market conditions. Exploring the page can offer traders and investors a practical entry point into AI-assisted decision-making.
When placed side by side, CIGI and NMRK present a study in contrasting business philosophies. Colliers has pursued a deliberate diversification strategy, reducing its reliance on cyclical transaction-based revenues by building substantial engineering and investment management divisions. This has resulted in a larger revenue base ($5.56 billion vs. $3.29 billion) and higher absolute EBITDA, but also lower net profit margins (1.45% vs. 4.30%) and a significantly higher trailing P/E ratio (approximately 61x vs. 19x) — partly a function of GAAP earnings being compressed by non-controlling interest charges and acquisition-related amortization.
Newmark, by contrast, has maintained a more concentrated focus on commercial real estate advisory and capital markets. This specialization has yielded superior profitability metrics — ROE of 26.23% versus 20.31%, and ROA (return on assets) of 8.13% versus 4.43% — alongside stronger operating leverage during periods of market expansion. However, this focus also translates to higher cyclical sensitivity, as reflected in Newmark's elevated beta of 1.68 compared to Colliers' 1.26. When transaction volumes contract, Newmark's earnings are likely to feel the impact more acutely.
On the valuation front, NMRK appears substantially cheaper on both trailing and forward earnings bases, with a forward P/E below 8x, versus roughly 13x for CIGI. Both stocks trade at similar price-to-sales ratios (0.91 and 0.83, respectively). Institutional conviction tilts in Colliers' favor, with 80.1% institutional ownership and 15.3% insider ownership, signaling strong alignment between management and shareholders. Newmark's institutional base is narrower at 58.4%. The risk-reward calculus diverges meaningfully: CIGI offers greater diversification and long-term compounding potential, while NMRK offers sharper operating leverage and a deeper value proposition for investors willing to accept higher cyclicality.
Based on an analysis of observable factors — including trend consistency, diversification quality, recurring revenue composition, and relative market positioning — Tickeron's AI analytical framework would likely express a measured preference for CIGI in the current environment. The rationale centers on several structural advantages: Colliers' three-engine model provides earnings resilience that is less dependent on any single transaction cycle; the company's higher proportion of recurring revenues (over 70%) offers greater visibility into future cash flows; and insider ownership of 15.3% reflects deep management commitment. Recent technical analysis indicators have also shown a higher number of bullish signals for CIGI relative to NMRK. That said, Newmark's compelling valuation, superior margins, and demonstrated ability to generate organic growth should not be discounted — particularly if transaction markets continue to recover. The AI verdict is probabilistic, not definitive, and recognizes that the optimal choice depends on an investor's specific time horizon and risk tolerance.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CIGI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNMRK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CIGI’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMRK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
CIGI (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +1.09% price change this week, while NMRK (@Real Estate Development) price change was -2.57% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.03%.
CIGI is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
NMRK is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
| CIGI | NMRK | CIGI / NMRK | |
| Capitalization | 5.03B | 2.66B | 189% |
| EBITDA | 661M | 460M | 144% |
| Gain YTD | -32.855 | -13.007 | 253% |
| P/E Ratio | 46.71 | 18.74 | 249% |
| Revenue | 5.96B | 3.48B | 171% |
| Total Cash | 265M | 212M | 125% |
| Total Debt | 3.31B | 2.46B | 135% |
CIGI | NMRK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 61 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 81 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 83 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NMRK's Valuation (13) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for CIGI (92). This means that NMRK’s stock grew significantly faster than CIGI’s over the last 12 months.
NMRK's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CIGI (100). This means that NMRK’s stock grew similarly to CIGI’s over the last 12 months.
NMRK's SMR Rating (72) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CIGI (80). This means that NMRK’s stock grew similarly to CIGI’s over the last 12 months.
NMRK's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CIGI (62). This means that NMRK’s stock grew similarly to CIGI’s over the last 12 months.
CIGI's P/E Growth Rating (83) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NMRK (95). This means that CIGI’s stock grew similarly to NMRK’s over the last 12 months.
| CIGI | NMRK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 68% | 6 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 11 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 77% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TEK | 36.43 | 0.46 | +1.29% |
| iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF | |||
| PSI | 136.44 | 1.57 | +1.16% |
| Invesco Semiconductors ETF | |||
| SPIT | 32.28 | 0.16 | +0.51% |
| F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | |||
| DJUN | 49.42 | 0.21 | +0.42% |
| FT Vest US Equity Deep Bfr ETF Jun | |||
| DIVP | 27.40 | N/A | N/A |
| Cullen Enhanced Equity Income ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIGI has been closely correlated with CBRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIGI jumps, then CBRE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIGI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIGI | 100% | -0.84% | ||
| CBRE - CIGI | 72% Closely correlated | -1.77% | ||
| NMRK - CIGI | 68% Closely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| CWK - CIGI | 66% Closely correlated | -2.61% | ||
| FSV - CIGI | 48% Loosely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| CSGP - CIGI | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.38% | ||
More | ||||