Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIHCX vs TRIGX
CIHCX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts CIHCX vs TRIGX
CIHCX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIHCX vs. TRIGX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIHCX is a Buy and TRIGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17.3B vs. CIHCX (445M). CIHCX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: CIHCX (2.67) vs TRIGX (2.29). CIHCX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: CIHCX (21 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). CIHCX (2.22) is less costly to investors than TRIGX (0.81). CIHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 125.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). CIHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRIGX: CIHCX (1000) vs TRIGX (2500). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.55 vs. CIHCX (18.83). TRIGX return over 5 years is better than : 95.83 vs. CIHCX (52.67).
| CIHCX | TRIGX | CIHCX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.00 | 0.81 | 247% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.22 | 0.81 | 274% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.299 | 17.325 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 445M | 17.3B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.67 | 2.29 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.83 | 27.55 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.02 | 92.17 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.67 | 95.83 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.52 | 156.78 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement