Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CILGX vs RMEBX
CILGX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts CILGX vs RMEBX
CILGX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CILGX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CILGX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. CILGX (34.3M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than CILGX: RMEBX (1.04) vs CILGX (0.79). CILGX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: CILGX (10 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CILGX (0.78). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. CILGX (25.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CILGX: RMEBX (250) vs CILGX (10000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.11 vs. CILGX (-3.99). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 34.74 vs. CILGX (-6.43).
| CILGX | RMEBX | CILGX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.07 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 1.07 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.136 | 6.308 | -145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.3M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.04 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.99 | 9.11 | -44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.32 | 34.37 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.43 | 34.74 | -19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.02 | 94.33 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement