Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs FFAAX
CIMAX vs FFAAX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs FFAAX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$27.08
Change-$0.15 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.38B
Franklin Global Allocation Adv
Price$17.05
Change-$0.04 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.81B
CIMAX vs FFAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. FFAAX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and FFAAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. FFAAX (2.81B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than FFAAX: CIMAX (3.67) vs FFAAX (0.86). CIMAX was incepted earlier than FFAAX: CIMAX (24 years) vs FFAAX (22 years). FFAAX (0.77) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). CIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FFAAX (59.82). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAAX: CIMAX (250) vs FFAAX (100000). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.33 vs. FFAAX (8.94). FFAAX return over 5 years is better than : 50.67 vs. CIMAX (43.11).
| CIMAX | FFAAX | CIMAX / FFAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.74 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.77 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.671 | 8.792 | 144% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 137B | 2.81B | 4,872% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.67 | 0.86 | 429% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.33 | 8.94 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.69 | 36.05 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.11 | 50.67 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.12 | 57.09 | 146% |