Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs FFAAX
CIMAX vs FFAAX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs FFAAX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$25.76
Change-$0.25 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.24B
Franklin Global Allocation Adv
Price$16.36
Change-$0.15 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.72B
CIMAX vs FFAAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. FFAAX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and FFAAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 131B vs. FFAAX (2.72B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than FFAAX: CIMAX (3.85) vs FFAAX (1.32). CIMAX was incepted earlier than FFAAX: CIMAX (23 years) vs FFAAX (22 years). FFAAX (0.77) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). CIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FFAAX (59.82). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAAX: CIMAX (250) vs FFAAX (100000). FFAAX (10.09) and CIMAX (9.84) have marching annual gain over last year. FFAAX (51.13) and CIMAX (50.04) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CIMAX | FFAAX | CIMAX / FFAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.74 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.77 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.491 | 4.692 | 138% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 131B | 2.72B | 4,818% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.85 | 1.32 | 292% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.84 | 10.09 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.79 | 28.33 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.04 | 51.13 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.46 | 36.79 | 167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement