Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs FFAAX
CIMAX vs FFAAX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs FFAAX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$26.67
Change+$0.11 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.32B
Franklin Global Allocation Adv
Price$16.56
Change-$0.03 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.76B
CIMAX vs FFAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. FFAAX commentary
Jul 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and FFAAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. FFAAX (2.76B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than FFAAX: CIMAX (3.66) vs FFAAX (0.86). CIMAX was incepted earlier than FFAAX: CIMAX (23 years) vs FFAAX (22 years). FFAAX (0.77) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). CIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FFAAX (59.82). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAAX: CIMAX (250) vs FFAAX (100000). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.97 vs. FFAAX (9.41). FFAAX return over 5 years is better than : 54.53 vs. CIMAX (48.73).
| CIMAX | FFAAX | CIMAX / FFAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.74 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.77 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.507 | 5.609 | 187% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134B | 2.76B | 4,848% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.66 | 0.86 | 425% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.97 | 9.41 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.67 | 34.82 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.73 | 54.53 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.25 | 43.77 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers