Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs FFAAX
CIMAX vs FFAAX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs FFAAX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$27.55
Change+$0.11 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.35B
Franklin Global Allocation Adv
Price$17.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.86B
CIMAX vs FFAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. FFAAX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and FFAAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FFAAX (2.86B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than FFAAX: CIMAX (3.55) vs FFAAX (0.82). CIMAX was incepted earlier than FFAAX: CIMAX (24 years) vs FFAAX (22 years). FFAAX (0.77) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). CIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FFAAX (59.82). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAAX: CIMAX (250) vs FFAAX (100000). FFAAX (11.17) and CIMAX (11.15) have marching annual gain over last year. FFAAX return over 5 years is better than : 58.45 vs. CIMAX (48.86).
| CIMAX | FFAAX | CIMAX / FFAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.74 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.77 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.331 | 11.720 | 131% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 2.86B | 4,862% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.55 | 0.82 | 435% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.15 | 11.17 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.66 | 46.71 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.86 | 58.45 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.24 | 62.60 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement