Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs FFAAX
CIMAX vs FFAAX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs FFAAX
CIMAX vs FFAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. FFAAX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and FFAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 147B vs. FFAAX (2.97B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than FFAAX: CIMAX (3.44) vs FFAAX (0.96). CIMAX was incepted earlier than FFAAX: CIMAX (24 years) vs FFAAX (23 years). FFAAX (0.77) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). CIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FFAAX (33.16). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAAX: CIMAX (250) vs FFAAX (100000). FFAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.06 vs. CIMAX (8.91). FFAAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.34 vs. CIMAX (24.80).
| CIMAX | FFAAX | CIMAX / FFAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.75 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.77 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.963 | 8.276 | 72% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147B | 2.97B | 4,945% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.44 | 0.96 | 359% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.91 | 15.06 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.11 | 46.61 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.80 | 41.34 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.84 | 74.35 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement