Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs FFAAX
CIMAX vs FFAAX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs FFAAX
CIMAX vs FFAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. FFAAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and FFAAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. FFAAX (2.92B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than FFAAX: CIMAX (3.36) vs FFAAX (1.76). CIMAX was incepted earlier than FFAAX: CIMAX (25 years) vs FFAAX (23 years). FFAAX (0.77) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). CIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FFAAX (33.16). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAAX: CIMAX (250) vs FFAAX (100000). FFAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.80 vs. CIMAX (4.95). FFAAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.90 vs. CIMAX (27.94).
| CIMAX | FFAAX | CIMAX / FFAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.75 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.77 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.636 | 7.809 | 111% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150B | 2.92B | 5,146% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.36 | 1.76 | 191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.95 | 8.80 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.46 | 44.91 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.94 | 37.90 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.16 | 69.60 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers