Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs FGGBX
CIMAX vs FGGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs FGGBX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$26.23
Change+$0.06 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.88B
Templeton Global Balanced R6
Price$2.67
Change+$0.01 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets301.53M
CIMAX vs FGGBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. FGGBX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and FGGBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. FGGBX (302M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than FGGBX: CIMAX (3.73) vs FGGBX (2.05). CIMAX was incepted earlier than FGGBX: CIMAX (23 years) vs FGGBX (12 years). FGGBX (0.96) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). CIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FGGBX (43.31). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGGBX: CIMAX (250) vs FGGBX (1000000). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.62 vs. FGGBX (10.25). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.36 vs. FGGBX (24.89).
| CIMAX | FGGBX | CIMAX / FGGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.89 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.96 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.434 | 11.765 | 72% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 132B | 302M | 43,709% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.73 | 2.05 | 182% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.62 | 10.25 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.61 | 19.11 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.36 | 24.89 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.22 | 11.72 | 582% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement