Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs FGGBX
CIMAX vs FGGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs FGGBX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$26.64
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.82B
Templeton Global Balanced R6
Price$2.71
Change+$0.01 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets307.61M
CIMAX vs FGGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. FGGBX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and FGGBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FGGBX (308M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than FGGBX: CIMAX (3.66) vs FGGBX (2.60). CIMAX was incepted earlier than FGGBX: CIMAX (23 years) vs FGGBX (12 years). FGGBX (0.96) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). CIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FGGBX (43.31). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGGBX: CIMAX (250) vs FGGBX (1000000). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.23 vs. FGGBX (13.38). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 49.88 vs. FGGBX (28.74).
| CIMAX | FGGBX | CIMAX / FGGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.89 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.96 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.840 | 15.070 | 72% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 308M | 43,831% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.66 | 2.60 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.23 | 13.38 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.44 | 33.88 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.88 | 28.74 | 174% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.77 | 15.84 | 459% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement