Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs FGGBX
CIMAX vs FGGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs FGGBX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$27.50
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.91B
Templeton Global Dynamic Income R6
Price$2.84
Change+$0.01 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets313.82M
CIMAX vs FGGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. FGGBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and FGGBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. FGGBX (314M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than FGGBX: CIMAX (3.55) vs FGGBX (3.30). CIMAX was incepted earlier than FGGBX: CIMAX (24 years) vs FGGBX (12 years). FGGBX (0.96) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). CIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FGGBX (43.31). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGGBX: CIMAX (250) vs FGGBX (1000000). FGGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.09 vs. CIMAX (10.91). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 45.27 vs. FGGBX (31.65).
| CIMAX | FGGBX | CIMAX / FGGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.89 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.96 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.122 | 22.334 | 68% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 314M | 44,268% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.55 | 3.30 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.91 | 16.09 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.27 | 54.81 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.27 | 31.65 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.47 | 28.14 | 297% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement