Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs FGGBX
CIMAX vs FGGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs FGGBX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$26.69
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.7B
Templeton Global Balanced R6
Price$2.74
Change+$0.02 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.05M
CIMAX vs FGGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. FGGBX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and FGGBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FGGBX (306M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than FGGBX: CIMAX (3.67) vs FGGBX (2.62). CIMAX was incepted earlier than FGGBX: CIMAX (23 years) vs FGGBX (12 years). FGGBX (0.96) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). CIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FGGBX (43.31). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGGBX: CIMAX (250) vs FGGBX (1000000). FGGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.09 vs. CIMAX (14.20). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.70 vs. FGGBX (27.65).
| CIMAX | FGGBX | CIMAX / FGGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.89 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.96 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.048 | 15.923 | 69% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 306M | 44,118% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.67 | 2.62 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.20 | 16.09 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.16 | 30.86 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.70 | 27.65 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.69 | 16.33 | 445% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement