Ad is loading...
CIMAX vs FGGBX
CIMAX vs FGGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs FGGBX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$25.39
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.03B
Templeton Global Balanced R6
Price$2.56
Change+$0.01 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets292.22M
CIMAX vs FGGBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. FGGBX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and FGGBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. FGGBX (292M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than FGGBX: CIMAX (3.85) vs FGGBX (2.13). CIMAX was incepted earlier than FGGBX: CIMAX (23 years) vs FGGBX (12 years). FGGBX (0.99) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). CIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FGGBX (43.31). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGGBX: CIMAX (250) vs FGGBX (1000000). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.65 vs. FGGBX (6.11). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.45 vs. FGGBX (24.20).
| CIMAX | FGGBX | CIMAX / FGGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.91 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.99 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.962 | 7.143 | 69% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 292M | 43,836% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.85 | 2.13 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.65 | 6.11 | 158% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.32 | 19.89 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.45 | 24.20 | 196% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.94 | 5.44 | 1,101% |