Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs FGGBX
CIMAX vs FGGBX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs FGGBX
CIMAX vs FGGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. FGGBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and FGGBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. FGGBX (332M). FGGBX pays higher dividends than CIMAX: FGGBX (5.35) vs CIMAX (3.48). CIMAX was incepted earlier than FGGBX: CIMAX (24 years) vs FGGBX (13 years). FGGBX (0.96) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). CIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. FGGBX (50.24). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGGBX: CIMAX (250) vs FGGBX (1000000). FGGBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.98 vs. CIMAX (6.82). FGGBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.11 vs. CIMAX (26.46).
| CIMAX | FGGBX | CIMAX / FGGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.89 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.96 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.886 | 10.934 | 63% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145B | 332M | 43,675% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.48 | 5.35 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.82 | 22.98 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.84 | 47.20 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.46 | 33.11 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.00 | 58.21 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement