Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs FQTEX
CIMAX vs FQTEX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs FQTEX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$26.20
Change-$0.14 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.37B
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$12.95
Change-$0.10 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets365.49M
CIMAX vs FQTEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. FQTEX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and FQTEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. FQTEX (365M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than CIMAX: FQTEX (6.17) vs CIMAX (3.73). CIMAX was incepted earlier than FQTEX: CIMAX (23 years) vs FQTEX (6 years). CIMAX (0.61) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX (93.40) and CIMAX (92.00) have comparable annual turnover. FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: FQTEX (0) vs CIMAX (250). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.65 vs. FQTEX (12.71). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 73.73 vs. CIMAX (48.27).
| CIMAX | FQTEX | CIMAX / FQTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.11 | 555% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.010 | 8.038 | 112% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 133B | 365M | 36,438% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.73 | 6.17 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.65 | 12.71 | 107% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.42 | 38.47 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.27 | 73.73 | 65% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement