Ad is loading...
CIMAX vs FQTEX
CIMAX vs FQTEX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs FQTEX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$25.36
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.01B
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$12.32
Change+$0.07 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.2M
CIMAX vs FQTEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. FQTEX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and FQTEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. FQTEX (324M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than CIMAX: FQTEX (6.31) vs CIMAX (3.85). CIMAX was incepted earlier than FQTEX: CIMAX (23 years) vs FQTEX (6 years). CIMAX (0.61) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX (93.40) and CIMAX (92.00) have comparable annual turnover. FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: FQTEX (0) vs CIMAX (250). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.12 vs. FQTEX (5.99). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 67.57 vs. CIMAX (47.28).
| CIMAX | FQTEX | CIMAX / FQTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.11 | 555% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.838 | 0.748 | 647% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 128B | 324M | 39,506% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.85 | 6.31 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.12 | 5.99 | 169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.93 | 24.59 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.28 | 67.57 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...