Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs FQTEX
CIMAX vs FQTEX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs FQTEX
CIMAX vs FQTEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. FQTEX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and FQTEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 147B vs. FQTEX (617M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than CIMAX: FQTEX (6.38) vs CIMAX (3.44). CIMAX was incepted earlier than FQTEX: CIMAX (24 years) vs FQTEX (7 years). CIMAX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.08). FQTEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.34 vs. CIMAX (65.00). FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: FQTEX (0) vs CIMAX (250). FQTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.47 vs. CIMAX (7.80). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 57.29 vs. CIMAX (26.21).
| CIMAX | FQTEX | CIMAX / FQTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.08 | 737% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.680 | 7.292 | 78% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147B | 617M | 23,825% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.44 | 6.38 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.80 | 21.47 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.58 | 56.64 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.21 | 57.29 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.71 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers