Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs FQTEX
CIMAX vs FQTEX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs FQTEX
CIMAX vs FQTEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. FQTEX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and FQTEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. FQTEX (637M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than CIMAX: FQTEX (6.70) vs CIMAX (3.48). CIMAX was incepted earlier than FQTEX: CIMAX (24 years) vs FQTEX (7 years). CIMAX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.08). FQTEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 103.34 vs. CIMAX (65.00). FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: FQTEX (0) vs CIMAX (250). FQTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.20 vs. CIMAX (6.82). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 56.85 vs. CIMAX (26.46).
| CIMAX | FQTEX | CIMAX / FQTEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.08 | 737% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.886 | 8.570 | 80% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145B | 637M | 22,763% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.48 | 6.70 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.82 | 17.20 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.84 | 54.40 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.46 | 56.85 | 47% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.00 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers