Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs FSBLX
CIMAX vs FSBLX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs FSBLX
CIMAX vs FSBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. FSBLX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and FSBLX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. FSBLX (289M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than FSBLX: CIMAX (3.48) vs FSBLX (2.21). CIMAX was incepted earlier than FSBLX: CIMAX (24 years) vs FSBLX (10 years). FSBLX (1.10) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). FSBLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). FSBLX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: FSBLX (0) vs CIMAX (250). FSBLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.34 vs. CIMAX (6.82). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.46 vs. FSBLX (12.13).
| CIMAX | FSBLX | CIMAX / FSBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.84 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.10 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.886 | 8.137 | 85% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145B | 289M | 50,173% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.48 | 2.21 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.82 | 12.34 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.84 | 37.49 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.46 | 12.13 | 218% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.00 | 61.70 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement