Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs HRLAX
CIMAX vs HRLAX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs HRLAX
CIMAX vs HRLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. HRLAX commentary
Jul 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and HRLAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. HRLAX (65.8M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than HRLAX: CIMAX (3.48) vs HRLAX (3.30). CIMAX was incepted earlier than HRLAX: CIMAX (24 years) vs HRLAX (16 years). HRLAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). HRLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). HRLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CIMAX (4%) vs CIMAX (4%). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLAX: CIMAX (250) vs HRLAX (2000). HRLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.34 vs. CIMAX (6.35). HRLAX return over 5 years is better than : 43.42 vs. CIMAX (26.42).
| CIMAX | HRLAX | CIMAX / HRLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.25 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.69 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.886 | 10.581 | 65% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145B | 65.8M | 220,365% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.48 | 3.30 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.35 | 18.34 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.50 | 37.59 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.42 | 43.42 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.57 | 79.32 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers