Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs HRLAX
CIMAX vs HRLAX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs HRLAX
CIMAX vs HRLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. HRLAX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and HRLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 147B vs. HRLAX (67M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than HRLAX: CIMAX (3.44) vs HRLAX (3.17). CIMAX was incepted earlier than HRLAX: CIMAX (24 years) vs HRLAX (16 years). HRLAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). HRLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). HRLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CIMAX (4%) vs CIMAX (4%). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLAX: CIMAX (250) vs HRLAX (2000). HRLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.98 vs. CIMAX (8.29). HRLAX return over 5 years is better than : 43.92 vs. CIMAX (25.56).
| CIMAX | HRLAX | CIMAX / HRLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.25 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.69 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.968 | 12.759 | 55% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147B | 67M | 219,403% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.44 | 3.17 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.29 | 21.98 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.08 | 41.44 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.56 | 43.92 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.31 | 91.54 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers