Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs HRLAX
CIMAX vs HRLAX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs HRLAX
CIMAX vs HRLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. HRLAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and HRLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. HRLAX (76.3M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than HRLAX: CIMAX (3.36) vs HRLAX (3.07). CIMAX was incepted earlier than HRLAX: CIMAX (25 years) vs HRLAX (16 years). HRLAX (1.69) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). HRLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). HRLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CIMAX (4%) vs CIMAX (4%). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLAX: CIMAX (250) vs HRLAX (2000). HRLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.01 vs. CIMAX (4.95). HRLAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.93 vs. CIMAX (27.94).
| CIMAX | HRLAX | CIMAX / HRLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.25 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.69 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.636 | 15.871 | 54% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150B | 76.3M | 196,592% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.36 | 3.07 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.95 | 20.01 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.46 | 42.52 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.94 | 48.93 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.16 | 90.79 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement