Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs HRLCX
CIMAX vs HRLCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs HRLCX
CIMAX vs HRLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. HRLCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and HRLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. HRLCX (65.8M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than HRLCX: CIMAX (3.48) vs HRLCX (2.66). CIMAX was incepted earlier than HRLCX: CIMAX (24 years) vs HRLCX (16 years). HRLCX (2.54) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). HRLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLCX: CIMAX (250) vs HRLCX (2000). HRLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.42 vs. CIMAX (6.82). HRLCX return over 5 years is better than : 38.28 vs. CIMAX (26.46).
| CIMAX | HRLCX | CIMAX / HRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 2.00 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 2.54 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.886 | 10.128 | 68% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145B | 65.8M | 220,365% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.48 | 2.66 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.82 | 17.42 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.84 | 32.49 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.46 | 38.28 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.00 | 67.77 | 112% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement