Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs HRLCX
CIMAX vs HRLCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs HRLCX
CIMAX vs HRLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. HRLCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and HRLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. HRLCX (76.8M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than HRLCX: CIMAX (3.40) vs HRLCX (2.53). CIMAX was incepted earlier than HRLCX: CIMAX (25 years) vs HRLCX (16 years). HRLCX (2.54) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). HRLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLCX: CIMAX (250) vs HRLCX (2000). HRLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.22 vs. CIMAX (9.33). HRLCX return over 5 years is better than : 49.71 vs. CIMAX (30.63).
| CIMAX | HRLCX | CIMAX / HRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 2.00 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 2.54 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.581 | 17.271 | 61% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 76.8M | 192,708% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.40 | 2.53 | 134% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.33 | 24.22 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.31 | 44.82 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.63 | 49.71 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.49 | 77.39 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers