Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs HRLCX
CIMAX vs HRLCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs HRLCX
CIMAX vs HRLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. HRLCX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and HRLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. HRLCX (76.3M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than HRLCX: CIMAX (3.36) vs HRLCX (2.48). CIMAX was incepted earlier than HRLCX: CIMAX (25 years) vs HRLCX (16 years). HRLCX (2.54) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). HRLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than HRLCX: CIMAX (250) vs HRLCX (2000). HRLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.17 vs. CIMAX (4.95). HRLCX return over 5 years is better than : 43.51 vs. CIMAX (27.94).
| CIMAX | HRLCX | CIMAX / HRLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 2.00 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 2.54 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.636 | 15.352 | 56% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150B | 76.3M | 196,592% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.36 | 2.48 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.95 | 19.17 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.46 | 39.43 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.94 | 43.51 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.16 | 78.90 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers