Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs HRLRX
CIMAX vs HRLRX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs HRLRX
CIMAX vs HRLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. HRLRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and HRLRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 147B vs. HRLRX (65.2M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than HRLRX: CIMAX (3.44) vs HRLRX (2.92). CIMAX was incepted earlier than HRLRX: CIMAX (24 years) vs HRLRX (16 years). HRLRX (2.01) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). HRLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). HRLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: HRLRX (0) vs CIMAX (250). HRLRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.79 vs. CIMAX (7.80). HRLRX return over 5 years is better than : 41.54 vs. CIMAX (26.21).
| CIMAX | HRLRX | CIMAX / HRLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.50 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 2.01 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.680 | 9.578 | 59% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147B | 65.2M | 225,460% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.44 | 2.92 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.80 | 17.79 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.58 | 38.61 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.21 | 41.54 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.71 | 82.63 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement