Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs HRLSX
CIMAX vs HRLSX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs HRLSX
CIMAX vs HRLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. HRLSX commentary
Aug 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and HRLSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. HRLSX (67.9M). CIMAX (3.48) and HRLSX (3.33) have matching dividends . CIMAX was incepted earlier than HRLSX: CIMAX (24 years) vs HRLSX (16 years). HRLSX (1.71) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). HRLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). HRLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: HRLSX (0) vs CIMAX (250). HRLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.01 vs. CIMAX (9.12). HRLSX return over 5 years is better than : 48.23 vs. CIMAX (28.22).
| CIMAX | HRLSX | CIMAX / HRLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.20 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.71 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.325 | 14.757 | 56% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145B | 67.9M | 213,549% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.48 | 3.33 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.12 | 24.01 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.88 | 40.10 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.22 | 48.23 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.36 | 90.52 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement