Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs HRLSX
CIMAX vs HRLSX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs HRLSX
CIMAX vs HRLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. HRLSX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and HRLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 147B vs. HRLSX (67M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than HRLSX: CIMAX (3.44) vs HRLSX (3.20). CIMAX was incepted earlier than HRLSX: CIMAX (24 years) vs HRLSX (16 years). HRLSX (1.71) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). HRLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). HRLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: HRLSX (0) vs CIMAX (250). HRLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.03 vs. CIMAX (8.29). HRLSX return over 5 years is better than : 44.12 vs. CIMAX (25.56).
| CIMAX | HRLSX | CIMAX / HRLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.20 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.71 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.968 | 12.797 | 54% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147B | 67M | 219,403% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.44 | 3.20 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.29 | 22.03 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.08 | 41.70 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.56 | 44.12 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.31 | 92.51 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers