Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs HRLSX
CIMAX vs HRLSX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs HRLSX
CIMAX vs HRLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. HRLSX commentary
Sep 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and HRLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. HRLSX (76.7M). CIMAX pays higher dividends than HRLSX: CIMAX (3.36) vs HRLSX (3.10). CIMAX was incepted earlier than HRLSX: CIMAX (25 years) vs HRLSX (16 years). HRLSX (1.71) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). HRLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). HRLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: HRLSX (0) vs CIMAX (250). HRLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.19 vs. CIMAX (6.18). HRLSX return over 5 years is better than : 50.18 vs. CIMAX (28.45).
| CIMAX | HRLSX | CIMAX / HRLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.20 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.71 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.064 | 16.615 | 55% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 150B | 76.7M | 195,567% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.36 | 3.10 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.18 | 21.19 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.19 | 43.82 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.45 | 50.18 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.50 | 88.90 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement