Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs HRLZX
CIMAX vs HRLZX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs HRLZX
CIMAX vs HRLZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 147B vs. HRLZX (64.8M). HRLZX (3.49) and CIMAX (3.44) have matching dividends . CIMAX was incepted earlier than HRLZX: CIMAX (24 years) vs HRLZX (4 years). HRLZX (1.30) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). HRLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 149.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). HRLZX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: HRLZX (0) vs CIMAX (250). HRLZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.07 vs. CIMAX (7.13).
| CIMAX | HRLZX | CIMAX / HRLZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.90 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.30 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.108 | 9.346 | 65% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147B | 64.8M | 226,852% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.44 | 3.49 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.13 | 18.07 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.41 | 39.62 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.84 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.18 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement