Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs LGMCX
CIMAX vs LGMCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs LGMCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$27.50
Change-$0.05 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.35B
Loomis Sayles Global Allocation C
Price$25.55
Change+$0.06 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.93B
CIMAX vs LGMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. LGMCX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and LGMCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. LGMCX (2.93B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than LGMCX: CIMAX (3.55) vs LGMCX (0.28). CIMAX was incepted earlier than LGMCX: CIMAX (24 years) vs LGMCX (20 years). LGMCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). CIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. LGMCX (22.00). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGMCX: CIMAX (250) vs LGMCX (2500). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.57 vs. LGMCX (1.49). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 46.85 vs. LGMCX (-1.94).
| CIMAX | LGMCX | CIMAX / LGMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.91 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.91 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.122 | 10.203 | 148% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 139B | 2.93B | 4,752% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.55 | 0.28 | 1,288% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.57 | 1.49 | 710% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.27 | 30.23 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.85 | -1.94 | -2,417% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.47 | 37.02 | 225% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement