Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs LGMCX
CIMAX vs LGMCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs LGMCX
CIMAX vs LGMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. LGMCX commentary
Jun 07, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and LGMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 147B vs. LGMCX (2.78B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than LGMCX: CIMAX (3.44) vs LGMCX (0.22). CIMAX was incepted earlier than LGMCX: CIMAX (24 years) vs LGMCX (20 years). LGMCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). CIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. LGMCX (35.00). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGMCX: CIMAX (250) vs LGMCX (2500). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.11 vs. LGMCX (6.59). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 23.65 vs. LGMCX (-9.47).
| CIMAX | LGMCX | CIMAX / LGMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.91 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.91 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.422 | 4.265 | 127% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147B | 2.78B | 5,295% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.44 | 0.22 | 1,555% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | 6.59 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.60 | 21.64 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.65 | -9.47 | -250% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.65 | 38.36 | 205% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers