Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs LGMCX
CIMAX vs LGMCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs LGMCX
CIMAX vs LGMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. LGMCX commentary
Aug 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and LGMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. LGMCX (2.82B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than LGMCX: CIMAX (3.40) vs LGMCX (0.22). CIMAX was incepted earlier than LGMCX: CIMAX (24 years) vs LGMCX (21 years). LGMCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). CIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. LGMCX (35.00). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGMCX: CIMAX (250) vs LGMCX (2500). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.21 vs. LGMCX (6.81). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 28.55 vs. LGMCX (-10.49).
| CIMAX | LGMCX | CIMAX / LGMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.90 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.91 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.025 | 7.578 | 119% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145B | 2.82B | 5,147% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.40 | 0.22 | 1,557% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.21 | 6.81 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.36 | 21.25 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.55 | -10.49 | -272% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.52 | 40.09 | 198% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers