Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs LGMNX
CIMAX vs LGMNX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs LGMNX
CIMAX vs LGMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. LGMNX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and LGMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 145B vs. LGMNX (2.82B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than LGMNX: CIMAX (3.48) vs LGMNX (1.23). CIMAX was incepted earlier than LGMNX: CIMAX (24 years) vs LGMNX (9 years). LGMNX (0.83) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). CIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. LGMNX (35.00). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGMNX: CIMAX (250) vs LGMNX (1000000). LGMNX (7.07) and CIMAX (6.82) have marching annual gain over last year. CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.46 vs. LGMNX (-3.51).
| CIMAX | LGMNX | CIMAX / LGMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.83 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.83 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.886 | 6.763 | 102% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 145B | 2.82B | 5,140% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.48 | 1.23 | 282% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.82 | 7.07 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.84 | 22.95 | 147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.46 | -3.51 | -753% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.00 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement