Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs LGMNX
CIMAX vs LGMNX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs LGMNX
CIMAX vs LGMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. LGMNX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and LGMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 147B vs. LGMNX (2.83B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than LGMNX: CIMAX (3.44) vs LGMNX (1.25). CIMAX was incepted earlier than LGMNX: CIMAX (24 years) vs LGMNX (9 years). LGMNX (0.83) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). CIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 65.00 vs. LGMNX (35.00). CIMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGMNX: CIMAX (250) vs LGMNX (1000000). LGMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.74 vs. CIMAX (8.91). CIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 24.80 vs. LGMNX (-0.26).
| CIMAX | LGMNX | CIMAX / LGMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.83 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.83 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.963 | 6.685 | 89% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 147B | 2.83B | 5,193% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.44 | 1.25 | 276% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.91 | 10.74 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.11 | 29.19 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.80 | -0.26 | -9,432% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement