Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RAPCX
CIMAX vs RAPCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RAPCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$27.18
Change+$0.04 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.58B
Cohen & Steers Real Assets C
Price$10.90
Change+$0.02 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
CIMAX vs RAPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RAPCX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and RAPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. RAPCX (1.3B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than RAPCX: CIMAX (3.67) vs RAPCX (1.60). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RAPCX: CIMAX (24 years) vs RAPCX (14 years). RAPCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). RAPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. CIMAX (92.00). RAPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RAPCX (0) vs CIMAX (250). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.65 vs. RAPCX (7.63). RAPCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.63 vs. CIMAX (43.12).
| CIMAX | RAPCX | CIMAX / RAPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.81 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.93 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.087 | 10.400 | 126% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 137B | 1.3B | 10,538% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.67 | 1.60 | 229% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.65 | 7.63 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.59 | 10.65 | 269% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.12 | 45.63 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.79 | 58.15 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement