Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RAPCX
CIMAX vs RAPCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RAPCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$26.59
Change+$0.10 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.92B
Cohen & Steers Real Assets C
Price$10.73
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29B
CIMAX vs RAPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RAPCX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and RAPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. RAPCX (1.29B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than RAPCX: CIMAX (3.66) vs RAPCX (1.59). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RAPCX: CIMAX (23 years) vs RAPCX (13 years). RAPCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). RAPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. CIMAX (92.00). RAPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RAPCX (0) vs CIMAX (250). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.21 vs. RAPCX (7.84). RAPCX return over 5 years is better than : 52.04 vs. CIMAX (45.52).
| CIMAX | RAPCX | CIMAX / RAPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.81 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.93 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.632 | 8.675 | 123% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 134B | 1.29B | 10,355% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.66 | 1.59 | 230% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.21 | 7.84 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.20 | 16.60 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.52 | 52.04 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.68 | 44.99 | 157% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement