Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RAPCX
CIMAX vs RAPCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RAPCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$27.37
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.85B
Cohen & Steers Real Assets C
Price$11.06
Change-$0.04 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
CIMAX vs RAPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RAPCX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Buy and RAPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. RAPCX (1.39B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than RAPCX: CIMAX (3.58) vs RAPCX (1.56). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RAPCX: CIMAX (24 years) vs RAPCX (14 years). RAPCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.61). RAPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. CIMAX (92.00). RAPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RAPCX (0) vs CIMAX (250). CIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.20 vs. RAPCX (8.23). RAPCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.15 vs. CIMAX (46.82).
| CIMAX | RAPCX | CIMAX / RAPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.81 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.93 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.578 | 12.632 | 115% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138B | 1.39B | 9,957% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.58 | 1.56 | 229% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.20 | 8.23 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.70 | 19.14 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.82 | 50.15 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.88 | 64.08 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement