Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RAPCX
CIMAX vs RAPCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RAPCX
American Funds Income Fund of Amer 529A
Price$27.22
Change-$0.06 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.64B
Cohen & Steers Real Assets C
Price$11.23
Change-$0.05 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
CIMAX vs RAPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RAPCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and RAPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. RAPCX (1.48B). CIMAX pays higher dividends than RAPCX: CIMAX (3.57) vs RAPCX (1.53). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RAPCX: CIMAX (24 years) vs RAPCX (14 years). RAPCX (1.93) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). RAPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RAPCX (0) vs CIMAX (250). RAPCX (10.13) and CIMAX (9.74) have marching annual gain over last year. RAPCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.73 vs. CIMAX (39.98).
| CIMAX | RAPCX | CIMAX / RAPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.81 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.93 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.950 | 13.951 | 100% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 138B | 1.48B | 9,318% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.57 | 1.53 | 234% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.74 | 10.13 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.12 | 20.17 | 144% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.98 | 46.73 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.49 | 67.01 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement