Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CIMAX vs RAPCX
CIMAX vs RAPCX Comparison
Open Charts CIMAX vs RAPCX
CIMAX vs RAPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CIMAX vs. RAPCX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CIMAX is a Hold and RAPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIMAX has more cash in the bank: 148B vs. RAPCX (1.99B). RAPCX pays higher dividends than CIMAX: RAPCX (4.17) vs CIMAX (3.40). CIMAX was incepted earlier than RAPCX: CIMAX (25 years) vs RAPCX (15 years). RAPCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than CIMAX (0.59). RAPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 76.00 vs. CIMAX (65.00). RAPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CIMAX: RAPCX (0) vs CIMAX (250). RAPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.57 vs. CIMAX (9.33). RAPCX return over 5 years is better than : 45.84 vs. CIMAX (30.63).
| CIMAX | RAPCX | CIMAX / RAPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.81 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 1.91 | 31% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.581 | 16.147 | 66% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148B | 1.99B | 7,441% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.40 | 4.17 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.33 | 23.57 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.31 | 46.64 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.63 | 45.84 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.49 | 79.65 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers